A biweekly round-up of all the news items, big and small, portending the inevitable, unavoidable breakdown of humanity as we know it...
By: Jimbo X
New TV show starring Al Pacino encourages blacks and Jews to unite, kill anybody who disagrees with them for being “Nazis”
Al Pacino is rightfully considered one of the greatest actors of all-time. Alas, apparently he’s hurting for the moolah pretty bad these days, which is the only logical explanation for why he signed on to do the new straight-to-Amazon-streaming series Hunters. While all we have to gauge the show by at this juncture is a fairly brief trailer, holy shit, does it appear to lay the identity politics on thick, with a central plot about a cabal of multicultural freedom fighters hunting “Nazis” in New York in the 1970s. Oh, all the tried and true staples of the anti-Honky actioner are on full display on this one, running the gamut from the afro-sporting, Nubian princess killing machine to a Vietnamese “internment camp survivor” to a nun played by Kate Mulvaney, who apparently does nothing but smoke throughout the duration of the program, only to periodically say all sorts of woke and chronologically appropriate things about “the patriarchy” and “white fragility.”
Perhaps you’ve noticed this fuming, hyper violent aversion to the Caucasoid in mass-entertainment as of late. There’s HBO’s horrific bastardization of The Watchmen — which is LITERALLY some non-related jeremiad against the white man dressed up with the aesthetics of the 2009 movie, which it also has nothing to do with other than the title — and the almost identically titled The Hunt, a brazen ripoff of The Most Dangerous Game which centered around open-minded progressivists LITERALLY hunting down and murdering Donald Trump supporters for the LULZ, until the El Paso Walmart massacre got the suits at Blumhouse a little nervous. In that, it’s not surprising that the producer of Hunters just so happens to be Jordan Peele of Get Out fame, whose breakthrough 2017 horror-satire LITERALLY revolved around the unabashedly, textbook-definition racist perspective that African-Americans are physically and genetically superior humans, yet for some reason caught little to no flack from the mainstream powers-that-are over just such agitprop.
You may recall earlier this year, when a segment on the CBS show The Good Fight LITERALLY featured a character breaking the Fourth Wall and urging viewers to commit real-life acts of violence against the likes of Richard Spencer, on account of them being — you guessed it! — deplorable, despicable “Nazis” who need to be killed figuratively and literally before another Holocaust happens. It appears the Hunters is a program very much in the same vein, if not thematically, certainly ideologically — a cattle call to the enlightened masses to strike back violently against the perceived oppressor, based on some VERY questionable reinterpretations of what 20th century nationalism was all about.
Whenever I see such “entertainment,” my initial thought is always the same: “Don’t these people know that Nazis haven’t existed since 1945?” Indeed, calling ANYBODY a Nazi in the year 2020 has no cultural merit, much the same way deeming them a Jacobite or a Mongol is. The only difference is, when someone today refers to a cultural other as a Mongol or a Jacobite, they mean it in metaphorical terms — yet when they apply the same label to “Nazis,” they genuinely can’t distinguish guys who say the “n-word” on 4Chan from the guys who actually invaded Poland and made Austria its overnight bitch. They genuinely think neo-Nazi schlubs who listen to Skrewdriver represent a global threat on par with the LITERAL wehrmacht of the 1930s, this despite the fact the former has no luftwaffe of its own, let alone anybody who can rightly be called an Erwin Rommel to lead them into battle. Indeed, the greatest physical Nazi threat on the planet doesn’t even involve white people — rather, the closest thing there is to anything even remotely resembling a “real” Fourth Reich is Tsagaan Khas, a Mongolian Hitler fan club that hates the Chinese and is, apparently, really concerned about mining pollution.
Even worse, for some reason the American mass-media war machine just can’t get it through their thick skulls that Donald Trump (and most Donald Trump loyalists) are anything but anti-Semites. Indeed, Trump may be the most pro-Zionist president in United State history, and the last time I checked, “not liking the Jews” seemed to be pretty high-up on the required skill set for any bona fide Nazi sympathizer. Furthermore, the same braintrust behind shows like Hunters just can’t reckon the fact that, despite all of their derision of the racist elites, literally NOTHING will kill a person’s career deader than even the most minute traces of ethno-supremacy in contemporary America. Indeed, pretty much the ONLY racial group that’s considered fit for wide scale mockery and hatred, oddly enough, are the mass collective of “white people,” who aren’t just hammered with fuming hatred day-in, day-out on social media platforms like Twitter and YouTube, but actively marginalized by those same powers-that-are in Silicon Valley via identitarian-ideologist prejudices of their own!
The mere existence of a program like Hunters shows us EXACTLY where we’re at in contemporary culture. Rather than entertain, apparently there’s a large contingent of the Hollywood machinery that would much rather use its vast resources to socially vilify and denigrate its sociopolitical “enemy” than actually make a profit. In that, it becomes painfully clear that such “entertainment” is really propaganda of the most vile sort, the kind clearly meant to reshape the public consciousness towards a common goal, or at the very least, towards a certain governing political mindset.
Greed used to be the underlying root of the Hollywood-Industrial Complex. Yet today, it’s apparent that something entirely different is motivating the mass media machinery — indeed, judging from the rising tide of products like Hunters, it’s becoming quite clear that the entire entertainment vacuum has become a genuinely hate-driven apparatus, which won’t stop until the hearts and minds of the masses are filled with the same festering resentment and spite for those they deem most fitting of the distinction. Which, naturally, raises the question — isn’t the same thing Hitler tried to pull?
Youth machete fight breaks out during screening of Frozen 2
Remember when Joker came out a couple of months back, and the mainstream media spokes-puppets LITERALLY tried to get people to not see it by claiming it was destined to inspire alt-right incels to shoot up movie theaters? Well, here we are, two months later, STILL waiting for such theatrical carnage to ensue. Meanwhile, an entirely different movie — with a far different sociopolitical subtext — is already arousing mass public mayhem in Europe. That flick? Why, what else but Frozen 2?
The tomfoolery occurred at a theater in Birmingham late last month, which at least one Canadian publication indicates involved up to 100 people. Per Global News, a whole buncha’ ruffians emerged from a screening of Blue Story — a U.K. movie about black gang members, just for the record —and engaged in an all out donnybrook amidst a gathering for Frozen 2, complete with “young men and some women wielding knives and machetes.” In total, six teenagers, the youngest being just 13, were arrested for their part in the Frozen fracas, with one Birmingham police officer stating that responders had to utilize “Tasers to restore order” during the hilarious ordeal.
As an aside, Frozen 2 is a movie that has drawn some, ahem, attention, for its oddly polemic story, which appears to be a sort of furtive endorsement of both reparations, white guilt and the eradication of national borders in the name of fruitful, compulsory globalization and government-mandated diversity.
Tis a shame Disney just left out the part about mobs of machete-wielding teenage terrorists in the narrative, though.
Intersectionality crisis emerges when black man refers to homosexual white presidential candidate as a ‘lying motherfucker’
To the uninitiated, Pete Buttigieg is a Democratic contender for the United States presidency. He’s most notable for being the highest-profile out of the closet homosexual challenger for the Oval Office in U.S. history, and apparently being so intrinsically gay that the first four letters of his surname are LITERALLY “butt.” As it turns out, though, not everybody under the Great Liberal Intersectionalist Pyramid of Marginalization Aggrievement Rights(™) are quite so keen on “Mayor Pete,” most notably The Root writer Michael Harriot, who described the Democratic darling, rather bluntly, as “a lying motherufucker” in a widely-circulated and retweeted post from late November. In fact, Harriot’s screed is so scathing, I pretty much have no option but to publish a huge block quote from it in full:
Well, all I can say is GOTDAM. And for all of you “allies” out there, just remember — if this is what The Black Twitter(™) thinks about white people whose politics reasonably mirror their own, just IMAGINE how much fuming resentment they carry in their hearts for those they perceive as genuine social adversaries … which, as much as you may try to convince yourself to the contrary, will eventually, inevitably be you, too.
The latest teen tomfoolery in Atlanta? Hijacking school buses and beating the living shit out of elementary schoolers
Imagine, if you will, the abject horror of a group of remorseless white supremacists hijacking a school bus carrying black children. Odds are, such a terrifying ordeal would net worldwide publicity, if not constant around the clock cable news coverage and perpetual social media umbrage for days, perhaps even weeks on end. Well, just such a scenario happened outside Snapfinger Elementary School in DeKalb County, Georgia, last month, as a gaggle of teens literally stormed a school bus and brazenly beat the living shit out of several elementary school-aged children, to the point that one victim had to be hospitalized.
So, wondering why you didn’t hear a peep about the lamentable incident unless you lived within the confines of the metro Atlanta area? Well, it’s probably because I lied about the whole “white supremacist” part — indeed, such was actually just another unremarkable episode of black middle-schoolers and high-schoolers in a quasi-suburban area engaging in brutal mob violence against children of their own ethnoracial persuasion for the LULZ.
And with that in mind, one can’t help but ponder the most dangerous question of the 21st century: why are such horrific displays of violence against youths only worthy of widespread publicity if the attackers and the victims are different colors, anyway?
New York Times Op-Ed: Despite mountains of evidence to the contrary, there’s nothing negative at all from children growing up in single-parent households
Dr. Christina Cross is a sociology professor at Harvard, who, admittedly, is pretty hot. Still, that doesn’t excuse Dr. Cross from using The New York Times to shamelessly promote her ill-researched study claiming, rather brass-balledly, that single-parenthood is nowhere near the barrier to social mobility as those old chestnuts of, sigh, racism and economic inequality. I encourage you to try reading the lengthy academic tome at your own leisure, although I suppose I can come out now and read you the punch line to the study. Buried way down at the bottom of the study limitations, Cross states the following:
Let me help you a bit with this one, Christina — the fact that dad ain’t in the picture to offer his emotional and financial support might be the variable you’re trying to pinpoint here. In fact, in Cross’ free ad in the Times, she unwittingly digs herself even deeper into the world’s most obvious answer:
Golly gee, it’s almost like black kids tend to do worse academically than white kids regardless of their familial structure. Of course, rather than merely accept the empirical evidence supported by 80 fucking years of standardized test results, Cross instead uses her horribly contorted statistics to ramble on and on about the great and dire need to divest taxpayer subsidized resources from married families back to black single moms, as if increasing welfare payments would do anything to address the structural problems Cross keeps yammering on and on about, like “housing segregation” and “employment discrimination.”
In fact, Cross’ research was so illogical that even motherfuckin’ Mother Jones had to give her the old what-fer, with big-jawed white man Kevin Drum responding thus:
Interestingly enough, Cross’ research comes five years after another Harvard study, which assessed a plethora of social variables when it comes to social mobility in the United States. That study — which was much larger, much more robust and, frankly, much more professional — ultimately determined that not only was growing up with both biological parents in the home the single greatest predictor of individual social mobility, the researchers there ultimately determined that the greatest cultural variable determining social mobility was whether or not a child grew up in a community with FEWER per capita single-parent households.
It’s an unorthodox citation, I know, but I think I’m going to have to endorse the hot take from Fox Sports analyst Jason Whitlock on this one: not only is Cross’ study academically malfeasant, it can rightly be described as “pure wickedness” from the propaganda powerhouse that’s destroyed millions of black lives over the last 50 years through trumpeting the maliciously false ideal that government-enforced wealth redistribution is a viable alternative to fathers raising their own flesh and blood.
NHL head coach shit-canned for allegedly saying the dreaded N-word ten years ago
Late last month, Calgary Flames head coach Bill Peters resigned from the position after Akim Aliu — who, as fate would have it, is a Nigerian-Canadian hockey player who lasted just ONE season in the NHL — brought about unsubstantiated accusations that Peter once criticized his taste in music as, and I quote, “niggers fucking other niggers in the ass shit” … nine years ago. Well, rather than fight against the rising tide of oh-so-hip honky self-loathing, Flames’ general manager Brad Treliving quickly posted a message on the Twitter allegedly penned by Peters stating “the statement was made in a moment of frustration and does not reflect my personal values” and that “I was rightfully challenged about my use of language, and I immediately returned to the dressing room to apologize to the team.”
When asked by TSN why the totally irrelevant bust of an NHL player waited a decade to publicize the incident, Aliu responded accordingly: “It broke my heart, I think it made my career go downhill before it started. This isn’t to the degree of Kaepernick by any means, but if you play the race card, it’s most likely the end of your career.”
Which, yeah, is a pretty funny thing to hear from a man who has received the MOST publicity of his entire career from playing said race card like a goddamn fiddle. Oddly enough, around the same time the whole “niggers fucking other niggers in the ass shit” scandal started making the media rounds, several ex-members of the Carolina Hurriances came forward with allegations that Peters LITERALLY physically assaulted them for poor play — accusations, by the way, which have since been corrobarated by the team’s current head coach. Of course, in that case the players were merely mayonnaise-hued skaters of the European stock, and in case you didn’t know it by now, as a collective, globalized society we have determined that indirectly causing momentary emotional duress to a person of color IS FAR, FAR, FAR WORSE than committing actual assault and battery on a person of the non-melanated persuasion … and if it ain’t legitimate codified law in your neck of the woods, it’s probably only a matter of time until it becomes so.
Peloton commercial deemed sexist, misogynistic and problematic for reasons that remain totally indecipherable and unconvincing
Unless you’ve been living in a cave since Thanksgiving (or you’ve actually done more productive things with your life than watch TV and engage in masturbatory social media prattle, like reading non-fiction works of substance), you’ve probably heard about plenty of consternation over that infamous Peloton commercial, which features a rather comely leading actress of indiscernible ethnicity taking full advantage of the pricey workout equipment, all while the dulcet tones of Tal Bachmann meme the fuck out of the soundtrack.
Of course, rather than dwell upon the eerie Peloton cult-of-personality or address consumer privacy issues over its video monitoring features, scores and scores of irked women — most of them, assuredly, fat and unathletic — have penned sundry scathing screeds that I don’t feel like archiving here, alleging the ad of doing everything from promoting body-shaming to furtively endorsing domestic abuse. Oddly enough, a very common criticism of the advertisement is that the actress in question is already rather thin before starting her intense workout regimen, leading untold internet commenters to question what the intent of the commercial actually is — this, even though we ALL goddamn know that if it had been a commercial featuring an overweight actress losing weight through the device, the collective media shitstorm would be quadruply intense.
Of course, the REALLY concerning aspect of the public blowback is the unaddressed reality that legions of social media critics simply can’t understand why ANYBODY would want to engage in vigorous physical activity, develop disciplined workout routines and attempt to keep their bodies healthy instead of resembling large containers of lard in various hues and dimensions.
Good luck getting the CNNs and Buzzfeeds of the world to pitch a fit over that, though ...
Canadian “researchers” blame uptick in white suicide rates on “misperceived threat to their dominant social status”
You might wonder what, precisely, a bunch of Canadian researchers who have never set foot in the foothills of Appalachia might know about the plight of the rural, Caucasian poor in America — which, of course, is LITERALLY hate speech, even if you merely thought the question in your own head and never actually spoke it, YOU BIGOT.
Well, with that in mind, a new study from the University of Toronto makes it painfully clear to one and all as to why so many honkeys in the U.S. keep dropping dead before they’re even middle aged, and the result is oh so obvious — because they’re afraid their losing their “dominant social status” in the wake of so many dadgum minorities coming to the country and/or outbreeding ‘em, that’s why!
Ironically enough, the lead researcher — Arjumand Siddiqi — isn’t white or an American, but surely, anybody who is allowed to be an associate epidemiology professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health ought to know better than we do on the subject, right? Per her “findings,” one of the major contributing causes to the sudden epidemic of Caucasoid deaths south of the border is “the misperception that their dominant status in society is being threatened, which is manifesting in multiple forms of psychological and physiological stress.”
And hey, here I was thinking the Case-Deaton report was right on the money! To hell with all of that apologia about opioid prescription abuse and the continual loss of blue-collar employment to both automation and immigration and emigration labor, deep down, we ALL know the root of all that dying and crying is ‘cause all of them whites erroneously think “blacks are economically catching up to them, when in fact, income inequality and other socioeconomic factors continue to affect Black Americans more unfavorably.”
Well, except in the whole dying prematurely category, but come on — it’s not like THAT is a salient research topic or nothing like that.
Now, you might be wondering how exactly one would go about measuring something as seemingly objective and immaterial as “misperceptions of dominant status.” Well, let me just go on ahead and copy and paste the methodology from the report itself for you real quick:
So basically, this kooky Canuck simply said anybody who voted for Trump was automatically a honky irrationally and ignorantly worried that the colored man was making up to much economic ground on them, and NOBODY during the peer-review process said “uh, do you think this conforms with the Scientific Method, like, at all?”
Just remember, folks — this is what constitutes legitimate academic research worthy of government wealth redistribution in the Great White North. Which, if any, is good enough reason to never, ever listen to what they have to say about anything other than Wayne Gretzky and the best practices for getting maple syrup stains out of flannel jackets.
Media narrative horrifically disrupted when black religious zealots shoot up a kosher grocery store
Boy, oh boy, as soon as the news started circulating on Dec. 10 that a kosher supermarket in Jersey City was the site of an ethnically-motivated shooting spree, the mainstream media couldn’t WAIT to start their regularly scheduled Two Minutes Hate of the obviously lily-white perpetrators, who probably owned a whole buncha’ rebel flags and read The Daily Stormer and spent 19 hours a day on 4Chan. Alas, the story quickly got downplayed a day later, when reports emerged that the shooters in the lamentable affair weren’t just BLACK, but apparently BLACK HEBREW ISRAELITES, a kooky sect of hyper-racist, hyper-melanated nut jobs who claim to be the real Jews spoke about in the holy texts of Judaism and Christianity. Even better, one of the gunpeople of color was a 50-year-old woman, thus skewing just about every standard media narrative about mass shootings the MSM has on speed-dial anytime more than four people at once get murder-death-killed by projectiles.
Oddly enough, the media isn’t urging its readers and viewers to rally against the hateful rhetoric of the Black Hebrew Israelites, who — as fate would have it — were front and center for that whole Covington Catholich “smirk-gate” brouhaha earlier this year, although for some odd reason, they chose to focus on the minors who literally said nothign racist at all and not the gaggle of incense, hate-filled black people who repeatedly assailed them as “faggots” on camera.
How poetic it is that in the media’s incessant ideological war against “hate” and “racism” that they managed to completely gloss over an obvious vehicle of “hate” and “racism” that ultimately paved the way for six cold-blooded murders just 11 months down the line.
Well, poetic, or intentional, perhaps.
George Zimmerman suing Trayvon Martin’s family for $100 million
If anything can rightly be considered the touchstone of our contemporary wokeness uber alles culture, it would have to be the lamentable moment in 2012 when George Zimmerman shot and killed unarmed black teen Trayvon Martin in Florida. Alas, despite the fact Zimmerman is actually a Hispanic with a Jewish last name and “several black relatives,” of course the mainstream mass media wehrmacht made it a national effort to turn the legally justified homicide into the tipping point for a fuck da racist white man jihad pitting virtually everybody in society against Caucasoids with cocks. Well, after having pawned the gun he used to smoke Trayvon — who, incidentally, appears to smoke quite a bit of bud himself — online and watching a celebrity PPV boxing match against DMX hit a dead end, George Z. has acquired the services of infamous attorney Larry Klayman (who the “woke” media is trying to paint as a Ku Klux Konspiratorial Kook, even though he SUCCESSFULLY challenged Barack Obama in federal court in a case that determined NSA collection of cell phone metadata was blatantly unconstitutional as a motherfucker) and is now suing the family of Trayvon Martin, their lawyer, publisher HarperCollins and the State of Florida for $100 million, alleging their combined wrongdoings have caused Zimmerman “severe loss of reputation, goodwill and past, present and future loss of income, earning and other financial damage.” Furthermore, Zimmerman said the constant character assassination has led to at least one actual assassination attempt and, perhaps worst of all, gotten Zimmerman kicked off at least one or two different online dating sites.
You can read the entire lawsuit for yourself — and you most certainly should, at your earliest convenience — right here. Coincidentally, the lawsuit comes just months after the book The Trayvon Hoax: Unmasking The Witness Fraud That Divided America and a corresponding documentary with the same title was released. Of course, the “normie” media keeps dispelling and debunking the claims in both the book and the film, in particular the assertion outlined in Klayman’s lawsuit that the prosecution brought in a patsy to play the role of the person Trayvon was talking to on his phone the night George Zimmerman popped a cap in dat ass. Oddly enough, though, they’re not saying the same thing about the thousands of cell phone messages the author of the book obtained via an open records request from the State of Florida, indicating that T.M. may or may not have been involved in drug and weapons dealing prior to his death.
Of course, good luck getting the masses to ever mull the unthinkable possibility that George Zimmerman might be a little bit innocent and Trayvon Martin might be a little bit guilty in the whole fracas — you know, even though a court of law already determined such to be PRECISELY the case. But hey, why bother letting something as trifling as empirical reality ruin a perfectly good ideological narrative, eh, kids?
...and a few headlines that speak for themselves…
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.