Showing posts with label BlackLivesMatter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BlackLivesMatter. Show all posts

Thursday, February 9, 2017

21 Amazing Quotes from Booker T. Washington's 'Up From Slavery' (1901)

Wise words from one of America's greatest thinkers we'd all be wise to heed - black, white and everything in between.


By: Jimbo X

I don't care what color you are, there are three nonfiction books penned by black American writers everybody ought to read. We've already covered two of them - The Autobiography of Malcolm X and The Souls of Black Folks by W.E.B. Du Bois - and to kick off Black History Month 2017, I reckoned it was worth all of our respective times to take a nice, long gander at book no. 3 - Booker T. Washington's Up From Slavery

Booker T. Washington, for those of you not in the know, is the guy who's pretty much responsible for the Tuskegee Institute existing. Probably his biggest claim to fame as his legendary 1909 "Atlanta Compromise" speech, where he said black success in America wouldn't come about through civil rights legislation, but through education and entrepreneurialism. This, naturally, made him public enemy no. 1 to Du Bois and the founders of the N.A.A.C.P., who instead sought to bring about racial parity through legal challenges and public policy reform.

After re-reading Up From Slavery last year, it suddenly dawned on me why schools don't talk about any black American academics or civil rights crusaders before 1963. Simply put, you could yank any of Washington's arguments posited in his classic 1901 autobiography outlining the root causes of black economic failure and without changing a damn word, make it applicable to plight of contemporary African-Americans. If kids today had to read Up From Slavery in class, they might walk away from it with this crazy-ass idea that Booker T. WAS right - that simply changing the laws all willy-nilly to integrate blacks into "mainstream" U.S. society may not have been the best approach to curb racism or put African-Americans in better financial positions to succeed, or at the very least, remain self-sustaining. Egads, some of them may even develop the verboten idea that the Civil Rights Movement actually did very little to stomp out bigotry or make lives for African-Americans better, and had we gone the Washingtonian route and focused on black economic nationalism and supporting family structures instead of building a gargantuan welfare state and telling white kids to feel ashamed of being white from the time they enter preschool, blacks in America might be much better off, financially AND civically.

It's doubly - maybe even triply - damning because, as the title hints, this Booker T. Washington fellow literally began life as a slave. Forget microaggressions and white feminism and not being able to get a cab, this dude was literally considered chattel up until he was a teenager. So here's a guy that experienced the ULTIMATE form of white oppression coming out and telling us that government forced integration won't do much of nothing 60 years before anybody knew who Martin Luther King, Jr., was - and to top it all off, his success as academic and statesman PROVES that investments in real education ( i.e., the kind where you actually learn worthwhile, marketable job skills and not 250,000 different ways to blame Whitey for everything) and economy building is the actual cure-all for African-American plight. Shit, if that approach helped an honest to goodness ex-slave become one of the wealthiest and most respected men in the country, what excuse do middle and working class African-American teens today - who haven't experienced one tenth of one percent of the racial persecution Washington faced when he was their age - possibly have to justify their own financial failures?

In that, I consider not only Up From Slavery to be one of the most important nonfiction works of the 20th century, it's one of the few books I'd consider mandatory reading for anybody who dares consider themselves "American." Since it's in the public domain (I think), it shouldn't be too hard to find a copy of the book somewhere on the Internets. Frankly, you need to read the whole thing if you haven't, but for those of you who need a little appetizer plate to grasp why it's so fucking crucial you read it, I've clipped out 21 quotes from Washington's tome that succinctly sum up why Washington's way of thinking was so profound ... and is so utterly terrifying to critical theory proponents to this very day.

Quote One
“One may get the idea, from what I have said, that there was bitter feeling toward the white people on the part of my race, because of the fact that most of the white population was away fighting in a war which would result in keeping the Negro in slavery if the South was successful. In the case of the slaves on our place this was not true, and it was not true of any large portion of the slave population in the South where the Negro was treated with anything like decency. During the Civil War one of my young masters was killed, and two were severely wounded. I recall the feeling of sorrow which existed among the slaves when they heard of the death of 'Mars' Billy." It was no sham sorrow, but real. Some of the slaves had nursed 'Mars' Billy; others had played with him when he was a child. 'Mars' Billy had begged for mercy in the case of others when the overseer or master was thrashing them. The sorrow in the slave quarter was only second to that in the 'big house.'

Quote Two
“I pity from the bottom of my heart any nation or body of people that is so unfortunate as to get entangled in the net of slavery. I have long since ceased to cherish any spirit of bitterness against the Southern white people on account of the enslavement of my race. No one section of our country was wholly responsible for its introduction, and, besides, it was recognized and protected for years by the General Government. Having once got its tentacles fastened on to the economic and social life of the Republic, it was no easy matter for the country to relieve itself of the institution. Then, when we rid ourselves of prejudice, or racial feeling, and look facts in the face, we must acknowledge that, notwithstanding the cruelty and moral wrong of slavery, the ten million Negroes inhabiting this country, who themselves or whose ancestors went through the school of American slavery, are in a stronger and more hopeful condition, materially, intellectually, morally, and religiously, than is true of an equal number of black people in any other portion of the globe.”

Quote Three
“The whole machinery of slavery was so constructed as to cause labour, as a rule, to be looked upon as a badge of degradation, of inferiority. Hence labour was something that both races on the slave plantation sought to escape. The slave system on our place, in a large measure, took the spirit of self-reliance and self-help out of the white people. My old master had many boys and girls, but not one, so far as I know, ever mastered a single trade or special line of productive industry."

Quote Four
“The very fact that the white boy is conscious that, if he fails in life, he will disgrace the whole family record, extending back through many generations, is of tremendous value in helping him to resist temptations. The fact that the individual has behind and surrounding him proud family history and connection serves as a stimulus to help him to overcome obstacles when striving for success.

Quote Five
“In later years, I confess that I do not envy the white boy as I once did. I have learned that success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has overcome while trying to succeed. Looked at from this standpoint, I almost reached the conclusion that often the Negro boy's birth and connection with an unpopular race is an advantage, so far as real life is concerned. With few exceptions, the Negro youth must work harder and must perform his tasks even better than a white youth in order to secure recognition. But out of the hard and unusual struggle through which he is compelled to pass, he gets a strength, a confidence, that one misses whose pathway is comparatively smooth by reason of birth and race.”

Quote Six
“I have referred to this unpleasant part of the history of the South simply for the purpose of calling attention to the great change that has taken place since the days of the 'Ku Klux.' To-day there are no such organizations in the South, and the fact that such ever existed is almost forgotten by both races. There are few places in the South now where public sentiment would permit such organizations to exist.

Quote Seven
“I felt that the Reconstruction policy, so far as it related to my race, was in a large measure on a false foundation, was artificial and forced. In many cases it seemed to me that the ignorance of my race was being used as a tool with which to help white men into office, and that there was an element in the North which wanted to punish the Southern white men by forcing the Negro into positions over the heads of the Southern whites. I felt that the Negro would be the one to suffer for this in the end. Besides, the general political agitation drew the attention of our people away from the more fundamental matters of perfecting themselves in the industries at their doors and in securing property.”

Quote Eight
“More and more I am convinced that the final solution of the political end of our race problem will be for each state that finds it necessary to change the law bearing upon the franchise to make the law apply with absolute honesty, and without opportunity for double dealing or evasion, to both races alike. Any other course my daily observation in the South convinces me, will be unjust to the Negro, unjust to the white man, and unfair to the rest of the state in the Union, and will be, like slavery, a sin that at some time we shall have to pay for."

Quote Nine
“I saw other young men who received seventy-five or one hundred dollars per month from the Government, who were in debt at the end of every month. I saw men who but a few months previous were members of Congress, then without employment and in poverty. Among a large class there seemed to be a dependence upon the Government for every conceivable thing. The members of this class had little ambition to create a position for themselves, but wanted the Federal officials to create one for them. How many times I wished then, and have often wished since, that by some power of magic I might remove the great bulk of these people into the county districts and plant them upon the soil, upon the solid and never deceptive foundation of Mother Nature, where all nations and races that have ever succeeded have gotten their start,—a start that at first may be slow and toilsome, but one that nevertheless is real."

Quote Ten
“My experience has been that the time to test a true gentleman is to observe him when he is in contact with individuals of a race that is less fortunate than his own. This is illustrated in no better way than by observing the conduct of the old-school type of Southern gentleman when he is in contact with his former slaves or their descendants. An example of what I mean is shown in a story told of George Washington, who, meeting a coloured man in the road once, who politely lifted his hat, lifted his own in return. Some of his white friends who saw the incident criticised Washington for his action. In reply to their criticism George Washington said: "Do you suppose that I am going to permit a poor, ignorant, coloured man to be more polite than I am?”

Quote Eleven
“At night, during Christmas week, they usually had what they called a "frolic," in some cabin on the plantation. That meant a kind of rough dance, where there was likely to be a good deal of whiskey used, and where there might be some shooting or cutting with razors. While I was making this Christmas visit I met an old coloured man who was one of the numerous local preachers, who tried to convince me, from the experience Adam had in the Garden of Eden, that God had cursed all labour, and that, therefore, it was a sin for any man to work. For that reason this man sought to do as little work as possible. He seemed at that time to be supremely happy, because he was living, as he expressed it, through one week that was free from sin.

Quote Twelve
“The making of these bricks taught me an important lesson in regard to the relations of the two races in the South. Many white people who had had no contact with the school, and perhaps no sympathy with it, came to us to buy bricks because they found out that ours were good bricks. They discovered that we were supplying a real want in the community. The making of these bricks caused many of the white residents of the neighbourhood to begin to feel that the education of the Negro was not making him worthless, but that in educating our students we were adding something to the wealth and comfort of the community. As the people of the neighbourhood came to us to buy bricks, we got acquainted with them; they traded with us and we with them. Our business interests became intermingled. We had something which they wanted; they had something which we wanted. This, in a large measure, helped to lay the foundation for the pleasant 'relations' that have continued to exist between us and the white people in that section, and which now extend throughout the South.

Wherever one of our brickmakers has gone in the South, we find that he has something to contribute to the well-being of the community into which he has gone; something that has made the community feel that, in a degree, it is indebted to him, and perhaps, to a certain extent, dependent upon him. In this way pleasant relations between the races have been simulated.

My experience is that there is something in human nature which always makes an individual recognize and reward merit, no matter under what colour of skin merit is found. I have found, too, that it is the visible, the tangible, that goes a long ways in softening prejudices. The actual sight of a first-class house that a Negro has built is ten times more potent than pages of discussion about a house that he ought to build, or perhaps could build.”

Quote Thirteen
“The individual who can do something that the world wants done will, in the end, make his way regardless of race. One man may go into a community prepared to supply the people there with an analysis of Greek sentences. The community may not at the time be prepared for, or feel the need of, Greek analysis, but it may feel its need of bricks and houses and wagons. If the man can supply the need for those, then, it will lead eventually to a demand for the first product, and with the demand will come the ability to appreciate it and to profit by it."

Quote Fourteen
“With God's help, I believe that I have completely rid myself of any ill feeling toward the Southern white man for any wrong that he may have inflicted upon my race. I am made to feel just as happy now when I am rendering service to Southern white men as when the service is rendered to a member of my own race. I pity from the bottom of my heart any individual who is so unfortunate as to get into the habit of holding race prejudice.

The more I consider the subject, the more strongly I am convinced that the most harmful effect of the practice to which the people in certain sections of the South have felt themselves compelled to resort, in order to get rid of the force of the Negroes' ballot, is not wholly in the wrong done to the Negro, but in the permanent injury to the morals of the white man. The wrong to the Negro is temporary, but to the morals of the white man the injury is permanent. I have noted time and time again that when an individual perjures himself in order to break the force of the black man's ballot, he soon learns to practise dishonesty in other relations of life, not only where the Negro is concerned, but equally so where a white man is concerned. The white man who begins by cheating a Negro usually ends by cheating a white man. The white man who begins to break the law by lynching a Negro soon yields to the temptation to lynch a white man. All this, it seems to me, makes it important that the whole Nation lend a hand in trying to lift the burden of ignorance from the South.”

Quote Fifteen
“When I went into the smoking-room I was never more surprised in my life than when each man, nearly every one of them a citizen of Georgia, came up and introduced himself to me and thanked me earnestly for the work that I was trying to do for the whole South. This was not flattery, because each one of these individuals knew that he had nothing to gain by trying to flatter me.”

Quote Sixteen
“My experience in getting money for Tuskegee has taught me to have no patience with those people who are always condemning the rich because they are rich, and because they do not give more to objects of charity. In the first place, those who are guilty of such sweeping criticisms do not know how many people would be made poor, and how much suffering would result, if wealthy people were to part all at once with any large proportion of their wealth in a way to disorganize and cripple great business enterprises.”

Quote Seventeen
“The effort to secure help from the Slater and Peabody Funds brought me into contact with two rare men—men who have had much to do in shaping the policy for the education of the Negro. I refer to the Hon. J.L.M. Curry, of Washington, who is the general agent for these two funds, and Mr. Morris K. Jessup, of New York. Dr. Curry is a native of the South, an ex-Confederate soldier, yet I do not believe there is any man in the country who is more deeply interested in the highest welfare of the Negro than Dr. Curry, or one who is more free from race prejudice.

Quote Eighteen
“And in this connection it is well to bear in mind that whatever other sins the South may be called to bear, when it comes to business, pure and simple, it is in the South that the Negro is given a man's chance in the commercial world, and in nothing is this Exposition more eloquent than in emphasizing this chance. Our greatest danger is that in the great leap from slavery to freedom we may overlook the fact that the masses of us are to live by the productions of our hands, and fail to keep in mind that we shall prosper in proportion as we learn to dignify and glorify common labour and put brains and skill into the common occupations of life; shall prosper in proportion as we learn to draw the line between the superficial and the sub-substantial, the ornamental gewgaws of life and the useful. No race can prosper till it learns that there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem. It is at the bottom of life we must begin, and not at the top. Nor should we permit our grievances to overshadow our opportunities.”

Quote Nineteen
“I am constantly trying to impress upon our students at Tuskegee—and on our people throughout the country, as far as I can reach them with my voice—that any man, regardless of colour, will be recognized and rewarded just in proportion as he learns to do something well—learns to do it better than someone else—however humble the thing may be. As I have said, I believe that my race will succeed in proportion as it learns to do a common thing in an uncommon manner; learns to do a thing so thoroughly that no one can improve upon what it has done; learns to make its services of indispensable value.”

Quote Twenty
“In this library I found a life of Frederick Douglass, which I began reading. I became especially interested in Mr. Douglass's description of the way he was treated on shipboard during his first or second visit to England. In this description he told how he was not permitted to enter the cabin, but had to confine himself to the deck of the ship. A few minutes after I had finished reading this description I was waited on by a committee of ladies and gentlemen with the request that I deliver an address at a concert which was to begin the following evening. And yet there are people who are bold enough to say that race feeling in America is not growing less intense!"

Quote Twenty-One
“Time and time again he said to me, during this visit, that it was not only the duty of the country to assist in elevating the Negro of the South, but the poor white man as well. At the end of his visit I resolved anew to devote myself more earnestly than ever to the cause which was so near his heart. I said that if a man in his condition was willing to think, work, and act, I should not be wanting in furthering in every possible way the wish of his heart.”

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

VH1's 'Inside Hate Rock' Special From 2002!

In the early 2000s, VH1 sought to "expose" the insidious "white power" indie rock scene ... and the results are sketchy, to say the least. 


By: Jimbo X
JimboXAmerican@gmail.com
@Jimbo___X

For a moment, just think how powerful Viacom was circa 2002. This was before the social media revolution, before YouTube, before smartphones and even before DVRs became entrenched in the American consumer experience. Yeah, you still had a shitty Internet connection that could download a five minute Metallica song in only three hours, but by and large, the television set was your multimedia window to the world.

And at that point in time, Viacom owned a disproportionately huge slice of the cable television pie. Among other holdings, they owned the cable channels MTV, Nickelodeon, BET, CMT, Spike TV, Comedy Central, TV Land and VH1. So it stands to reason that in this Information Age bottleneck, the multimedia conglomerate had substantial cultural agenda-setting power. Whatever they wanted to broadcast to the masses, they had free rein to do so, and when your only other alternative was watching fuzzy, constantly-buffering RealPlayer clips on your hulking PC's CRT screen, you were pretty much forced to accept whatever they were giving you.

In that, it seems pretty hypocritical - if not downright laughable - for the Viacom monolith to go after anyone for trying to push some sort of political agenda under the guise of run-of-the-mill entertainment. Indeed, Viacom pretty much WAS the chief cultural tastemaker for the pre-MySpace under 20-set, with our nation's gilded youth weaned on a steady diet of questionable Nickelodeon produce before graduating us into the multiculturalism uber alles indoctrination factory that was MTV. Say what you will about James Dobson being a wrongheaded asshole 99 percent of the time, his accounts on the pervasive influence of Viacom programming - and I mean that in more than one way - is right on the freakin' money: "MTV not only admits they are trying to manipulate the young and immature; they spend big bucks bragging about it."

And with that little nugget in mind, let's turn our attention to a super obscure relic from the early 200s - a VH1 produced "special" titled Inside Hate Rock.

Now, without even knowing anything about the program, odds are you can deduce what it's going to be about. In a very hushed, concerned tone, a disembodied voice will lecture the audience on the evils of that dastardly "white supremacist" music, designed to instill prejudice and vehemence in the hearts of impressionable youths across the Heartland. Despite the fact the audience for such music is just a teeny, tiny fraction of a fragment of a percent of the Viacom sphere of influence, they will continue to hammer home the point that this shit is dangerous with a big, bold, capital "d" and if somebody - like, I don't know, the federal government - doesn't do anything about it, before long the entire Midwest will be filled to the brim with KKK members blaring racist heavy metal out of their trucks and literally ethnic cleansing the plains. The funny thing is that this thing came out loooong before the much-maligned Social Justice Warrior/Tumblrina movement kicked off ... indeed, the special aired barely five months after 9/11, a point in time where people were much more concerned about not getting killed by psychotic brown people than they were hurting the feelings of overly sensitive brown people. 

"In Downtown Detroit, one of hatecore's biggest bands is mixing a new CD," the special begins. "And getting ready to hit the road again."

The band in question is called Max Resist. Well, I, for one, have never heard of them. And I'm living in the year 2017, where you can find all kinds of shit on the Internet. Needless to say, this VH1 special gave them more publicity than they ever received anywhere - which, as we all know, is the best way to kill something you don't want anybody to know about. No, wait, that's the exact opposite of what you would do!


This may come as a surprise to some readers, but believe it or not, she isn't a fan of Skrewdriver.

Seven hundred miles to the south, we're introduced to a band called the Carolina Sons, who were supposedly inspired by the music of Max Resist. "As I walk down the street, I don't like what I see, a sea of foreign faces, staring back at me," one of their sample lyrics go. Before being "introduced to the politics of hate," the band members say they were into acts like Styx and Men at Work. 

"They get into it because they see white privilege being eroded and they want to protect that white privilege," comments one talking head. "And they see joining the white power skinhead scene as the best way to do that." Yep, "white privilege" was a weaponized term way back then, too.

Nice, subtle editing from VH1 as one of the Carolina Sons members says he believes in segregation and images of black people opening up a car trunk is flashed over the screen. You get an even better display when one of the Max Resist members says he can tell when "outsiders" are around  - a quip accompanied by black and white images of hooded black men huddled together.

The lead singer of Max Resist talks about growing up in Detroit. He said he wasn't too keen on being carjacked and having to order pizza through bulletproof glass. "That's not the kind of culture I want to spend the rest of my life in," he says. He said he got into the skinhead scene because the punks were too Marxist and pro-homosexuality.

The lyrics to a song celebrating the death of Alan Berg are shown on screen (which, for the record, manages to rhyme the word "Swiss cheese" with "hebe.") This needs to TERRIFY us, claims one talking head. The VHS copy on YouTube is so old, it's impossible to read the captions for anybody's names, so I apologize in advance for being vague with my descriptions.

Max Resist recount doing a show in Sweden, in which the lead singer was arrested for giving a Nazi salute on stage. He was imprisoned for four weeks. 

Cue our first black interviewee of the program: white supremacists hiding behind the First Amendment, she says, "is ludicrous." They know the reaction their music has on people, she continues, and as we all know, the SOLE reason the First Amendment exists is to protect people from having their feelings hurt.

The ADL and SPLC are so hellbent on crushing what they deem "evil," the Max Resist guy says, that it's nearly impossible for the band to book gigs in the States. The Carolina Suns go to a seafood restaurant and one of the members talks about wanting to be in the music business so bad he wrote non-racist music under the stage name "Lone Wolf" and shipped it around to record labels. He considers writing songs about living in the country and fishing. "It doesn't have to be all white power," he adds.

We watch the Max Resist frontman get a tattoo of a German WWII soldier on his arm. "Rewriting history," the proud black woman says, is a way for kids "who otherwise wouldn't have anything to be proud of" to develop a sense of self and identity. So, uh, do you mean white kids may flock to hardline white identitarianism because general society frowns upon even innocuous displays of white cultural pride or that white people - just in general - have NOTHING in their collective histories to be proud about?

The Max Resist guy says making racist music is a way of expressing himself without getting involved in the criminal justice system. Take that away from him, he says, and he would have to go about "other means" to express his white power convictions. 

"Even white supremacists want to settle down," the narrator states upon learning the members of the group want to own a home and start a family and save up for retirement. You know, because the idea of skinheads having secondary desires that resemble those of everybody fuckin' else in society are totally shocking. Shit, next thing you know, you'll be telling me these Hitler-worshipping motherfuckers like ice cream and puppy dogs, too. Also, they edit to death this one quote from a Carolina Suns member about his daughter and "hatefulness" to make it sound like he's the most marble-mouthed retard on planet Earth - which, yeah, is pretty much what you expected them to do for a hit-piece "doc" like this.


Which is clearly more damaging to the black community than such uplifting rap numbers as "Lookin' Ass Nigga," "Bitch Niggaz," "Kill Me a Nigga," "Kill That Nigga," "This is How You Kill a Fuck Nigga," and of course, that all-time classic, "Pussy Nigga Killa."

Up next, we're introduced to yet another white power band from Detroit, the Angry Aryans (jeez, do you think being minorities in a city that's more than 80 percent African-American might be a common theme here?) "There lyrics are some of the most vile rants against Jews, people of color, and gays and lesbians that I've ever seen," quips one self-described "anti-racist" commentator. Hey, notice how these at the time fringe referential constructs like "people of color" and "white privilege" have become mainstream concepts over the last 15 years? "Because their blatant bigotry could invite retribution," the narrator says, "the Aryans insist on obscuring their faces for the cameras." A number of critics say how hypocritical it is for these people to say they are so proud of their race refuse to show their faces ... a condemnation that, yeah, is just a wee bit ironic considering the wardrobe choices of Antifa. From there, we get a breakdown of all of the latest neo-nazi codespeak, including the secret meanings of such innocuous signifiers like "14", "88" and "Z.O.G." 

According to one commentator, skinheads have been responsible for more than 50 murders since neo-Nazi punk was "introduced" in the 1980s. Of course, that's a sum that is actually exceeded by the number of homicides that have taken place within the inner circles of hip hop alone  - lest we forget, mainstream, Viacom-friendly acts like Snoop Dogg and Gucci Mane are among the many, many rappers out there that have actually been CHARGED with murder themselves. So yeah, white people singing about killing black people is absolutely disgusting and depraved, but black people not only singing about killing other black people, but actually DOING it? Naturally, that sits just fine and dandy with the Viacom Industrial Complex. The African-American anti-racist activist from earlier chimes in on songs with such cheery titles as "Still Just a Nigger" and "Faggots (Give Rainbows a Bad Name) - "The Angry Aryans CD really reads like a hit list," she says. "Basically, the answer to all that is kill them." Which is especially troubling, since there are positively no examples of black rappers expressing a desire to violently solve the problem of Whitey. Absolutely none on record, whatsoever.

Next scene, the Angry Aryans (why does that automatically make me think of The Angry Beavers?) revisit their childhood home in Detroit. One of them shows off all the street corners where he had the shit beat out of him by black kids. "Everyone faces disappointments," one commenter replies, "but not everyone becomes racists."

The ringleader of a racist record label says rock and roll music has been subverted into a weapon against the white man. Per the narrator, there are over 2,800 racist music web sites (presumably, I assume they mean white racist music web sites) spewing hate all over the goddamn place. And here it comes, the moment the special justifies its own existence:
"The fear in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks is that the white power music circuit is becoming an underground meeting place for homegrown terrorists."
Allow me some time to wipe off the coffee I just spat all over my laptop screen. You mean to tell me 3,000 Americans just got incinerated by hardcore, Islamic revolutionaries, and instead of worrying about more people dying at the hands of a global network of hate-driven religious fundamentalists, whose numbers could possibly be in the millions (and whose perennial targets include women, gays and the Jewish, no less) and you want us to instead be worried about a couple of hundred heavy metal bands that say "nigger" and "kike" a lot?
Oh, I get it - you're exploiting the violent acts of one kind of people as a beachhead to go after a much smaller, much less vocal and quite frankly, much less dangerous fringe community because it helps you espouse your tertiary pro-multiculturalism and pro-globalization goals. Man ... I sure am glad nobody does that anymore!

Next, we get some jibber-jabber about the ladies of white power music, complete with long, lingering shots of blonde, blue-eyed elementary schoolers frolicking around at a neo-nazi expo before doing "Heil Hitler" salutes and singing songs with the lyrics "strike force, white survival." (By the way, they grew up to become the group Prussian Blue, the subjects of the BBC documentary Nazi Pop Twins.) Then this suspiciously well-groomed white nationalist says it's important to instill into children pro-white tendencies before they go off to college and get bombarded with pro-diversity propaganda, start race-mixing or experimenting with homosexuality.

We get a ten second long quote from a band called Intimidation One and the guy from the Angry Aryans says he doesn't want his kids growing up in a multicultural environment. Eventually, the white man will have to form an army for its very survival, he says, and it's only a matter of time until the proverbial "shit hits the fan." And as we know, there is absolutely no equivalent to this rancorous racial resentment anywhere on the African-American side of the equation. None, anywhere, at any time, for any reason.


Your call: a campy gay cabaret performance or a hardcore white power punk concert? 

Up next, we meet George Burdi, the former lead singer of the Canadian white power metal band RaHoWa (that's short for "racial holy war," but you probably already knew that.) He reminisces about this one time he got arrested in Ottawa in 1993 for beating up a bunch of "anti-racists." Somehow, VH1 was able to track down a woman who said she was there and the RaHoWa frontman kicked her nose in.

Regardless, he spent four months in prison for assault - but, he also says jail was the best thing that ever happened to him, because it gave him time to contemplate his life and "reconcile his actions." So, he started reading non-specified "spiritual" books and staying up all night and meditating, and when he got out of the joint, he gave up on making Nazi music altogether. "I had spread so many negative ideas and harmed so many young minds," he laments. Naturally, this makes him a persona non grata in the skinhead community - but he doesn't really care no more, because he's 100 percent hate free and now playing music that sounds like really, really offkey techno metal while wearing suspenders over his bare stomach. His new band is called Novacosm, and what do you know, there's a grand total of two black guys in the group! And if you're wondering what they sound like, well - let's just say having actual gay sex isn't as gay as their music. Oh, and of course, his girlfriend is a self-described "East Indian" who experienced racism growing up "in a predominantly white culture." Together, they peruse through his old RaHoWa memorabilia, including a photograph of him with the lead singer of Skrewdriver (i.e., probably the most famous and influential white power punk band ever.) He says that many fans of "hatecore" are people who experienced parental abuse, and the music gives them a sense of empowerment allows them to feel like real tough guys. Alas, Burdi says he is certainly more content with his life in these, his post racist years. "I feel like a much bigger person now than I did then," he says.

And from there, folks? Unfortunately, that's all that appears to remain of this long forgotten special from the a decade and a half ago. I'm especially disappointed, since the bumper at the end of the Burdi segment promised us a detour into racist country music, and you knew that shit right there was definitely worth a' watchin'. 

I've searched high and low for any fragments of the rest of the special out there in Internet land, and sadly, it looks like the rest of Inside Hate Rock has truly become "lost media." Granted, there is at least one neo-Nazi tape trader that appears to be hocking it, but come on - who's really going to risk getting on the terrorist watchlist just to review some stupid old VH1 special on a junk culture comedy blog? Being the Web sleuth I am, however, there is plenty of material from 2002 covering the special, including press releases from VH1, a ton of reviews from the likes of The New York Times and - as you would expect - quite a few caustic comments from the denizens of Stormfront. And now, I REALLY need to see the rest of this thing, since apparently, it features commentary from Henry Rollins, members of Blink 182 and has an entire section dedicated to William Pierce - a.k.a., the dude who wrote The motherfuckin' Turner Diaries.



Interestingly enough, the vestiges of the Inside Hate Rock website are stilling lingering on the Web. Of course, virtually all the links have long expired, but the page does reveal a little more information about the "lost" content of the program. Tis' a pity there's no way to visit the 2002-circa message board - I'm sure there's plenty of poignant comments dispersed throughout. Also, that viewer poll - which asks the fairly Orwellian inquiry of whether or not "hatecore bands" should be verboten from public performances - has to have the most out-of-place "joke answer" in the annals of anything. And at what point in time and space did ANYBODY think P.O.D. was a "tough guy" band? Shit, even back in the ninth grade, we knew those guys were just a bunch of tattooed pussies. I mean, they were dudes with dreadlocks that didn't even smoke weed, for crying aloud.

Thankfully, the interview with ex-Black Flag frontman/the coach from Michael Keaton's Jack Frost Henry Rollins has been preserved for future generations to read and cherish. And as you would expect, his comments are well worth printing in full...



Kinda' hard to pick a favorite quote there, ain't it? Do we begin with Rollins playing the "doesn't have a dad equals susceptible to seedy outside opportunists" line - you know, the same one that is automatically discredited when it comes to explaining the disproportionate rate of violent crime committed by young black men? Or how about the irony of Rollins chiding white supremacists for taking advantage of interracial violence fearmongering, but not saying a goddamn thing about the fact that white people are eight times likelier to be physically attacked, raped or killed by a black person than the other way around? Or how about the part where he sums up just how terrible black oppression is in the modern era - holy shit, sometimes, they have to pay first before eating at Denny's! Well shit, if that's what constitutes oppression, I'm being hate crimed every fucking time I go to Taco Bell or Starbucks. Still, it's got some genuine LOL material, like the part about skinheads being too pussy to go to Judas Priest concerts and Rollins saying one hit wonder Jamiroquai sucks (this, despite that artist's music being 20 times better than anything Rollins has shat out since Weight.) Also, you just have to love Rollins unintentionally shooting down the entire white nationalist fearmongering angle of the TV special at the end, by effectively saying "you know, this really isn't as big a problem as most people think." 

And on that note, I can't think of a better way to segue into our concluding comments on Inside Hate Rock. Now, I don't really need to tell you this, but yes, there are indeed white nationalists out there. In fact, some of them even go as far as to physically attack, rape and sometimes kill people of different ethnoracial origins to sate their in-group bloodlust, and periodically, they build mobile Nazi death rays to try and kill the president. These are not exactly what you would call "good people" by any stretch of the imagination, but here's the thing - over the last 20 years, just how many people have the much maligned 'white power' sorts actually killed? Well, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center - which, by the way, considers the actions of black nationalist cop killer Micha X. Johnson and the 50-homosexual-corpse pile-up created by Muslim sociopath Omar Mateen forms of "right-wing violence" - there have been 63 murders perpetrated by "white extremists" since Timothy McVeigh's attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Building in 1995. Of course, the SPLC's tally also mixes up anti-globalist, anti-police, anti-feminist and anti-abortion "sovereign citizens" into the jumble of neo-Nazis and klansmen, so that greatly inflates the statistics. Meanwhile, the City of Chicago alone sees 12 times as many black people killed (virtually all at the hands of other black people) in one year than we've seen white supremacists kill any-non-white-victims over the last two decades. Hell, for that matter, black people killed six times as many white people committing run of the mill, ordinary crimes in 2013 than these terrifying white ray-ray-racists have killed minorities over a 20-year span. Sorry, Antifa, but the statistics aren't helping your argument here - indeed, careful consideration of the data suggest you're simply cherry picking isolated incidents and exaggerating the regularity in which they happen, while simultaneously - and hypocritically - looking the other way when the hard, hard data on REAL intraracial crimes snakes its way into the picture.

Remember the Red Scare during the 1950s? Yeah, I know there was one in the late 1910s, too, but silencio. Well, today, I think we're in the midst of a White Scare - that being, an absolutely hysterical anti-honky putsch led - irony of ironies - by super-white and super-rich liberals to make it seem like any Caucasian who isn't 100 percent in favor of multiculturalism and globalization is secretly a member of the Klan or a neo-Nazi. The theoretical "critical theory" jibber jabber spat out in Inside Hate Rock has indeed become the liberal canon, and there isn't a university in America that isn't sipping from the blatantly anti-white social justice punch bowl like gleeful FlavorAde drinkers at Jonestown. Inside Hate Rock is especially interesting as a historical piece, since it represents a very early attempt to instill into the masses the bedrock of cultural Marxism - indeed, one could even go as far as to consider it a trial run of sorts. It really is propaganda leeching off a lesser form of propaganda - by showcasing these blatantly racist white supremacists as some sort of underground cultural force despite making up an absolutely microscopic percentage of the general white populace, that gives you an easy springboard to turn around and say "but you know, all white people do have the Mark of Cain on them in the form of white privilege and centuries of white oppression." And as we all know - and as history has shown us time and time and time again - it's a very slippery slope from demonizing people to dehumanizing them - and yeah, bad shit generally tends to happen when one group of people considers a different group of people socially (and genetically) inferior.

As Inside Hate Rock clearly posits, a lot of bad can come out of efforts to deter diversity. Alas, VH1's jeremiad doesn't have the forthrightness or the guts to dare ask an even more poignant - and critical - question for our times: can't an equivalent amount of "bad" come out of demanding diversity, as well?

Saturday, October 15, 2016

This Week in Social Justice Warrior-Dom

A fond look back at all the things that had ultra P.C. jihadists outraged ... before they forget all about them in just a few days. 


By: Jimbo X
JimboXAmerican@gmail.com
@Jimbo__X


It's official: nonviolent 'racism' is a greater societal blight than extremely violent 'anti-racism' 

I have to admit: it gets pretty boring having to write about race relations in the United States so much. But since the media is so utterly obsessed with promoting it as the absolute biggest problem in American society - citations, still needed - I really don't have much of a choice. They keep pushing a curiously one-sided discussion about racial hostilities - which, itself, seems to be contradicted by federal data - and I have the social, NAY, moral obligation, to keep riposting with evidence-based, factually-informed articles of my own about the uncanny similarities between today's "politically awakened" social justice mobs and the McCarthyists of yore, the indisputable fact that multicultural consumerism has already devoured the long dead vestiges of national (let alone racial) identity and the frank, rarely spoken reality that it is classism - and not the much maligned specter of racial bigotry - that truly undergirds America's wealth inequality and social mobility problems

About a year or so ago, I made the absolutely insane suggestion that while porting about racist sentiments is clearly a bad character trait - even if surveys conducted by, of all publications, The Huffington Post, reveals that MOST Americans, of all races and ethnicities, tend to not give a shit if someone has a prejudiced worldview - it's not necessarily the worst thing a person can be. Indeed, I made the awful, awful presupposition that - compared to being a murderer, a rapist, a career criminal or a negligent parent - simply being a non-violent racist really isn't all that bad. At heart, it seems about the simplest thing in the world to grasp; doing something bad to someone is infinitely worse than merely THINKING something bad about someone. Granted, we can all agree that calling someone the dreaded, despicable and utterly unthinkable "n-word" is an impolite act, but is it truly a human rights violation on par with setting an old woman on fire during a home invasion robbery, or raping a young woman and later explaining to police she deserved it because of slavery, or even failing to pay child support for an entire decade?

Alas, over the last few years, there has been some sort of inexplicable geomagnetic reversal in the way Americans - especially the impressionable college-aged ones - think about such things. Pledging eternal allegiance to the new-new-new wave cult of political correctness, we now find ourselves in a cultural climate where millions of people believe "emotional harm" and "physical harm" are one hundred percent equal as cultural transgressions. Calling someone "stupid," they honestly believe, is no different than punching them in the face, merely having to look at a "Make America Great Again" hat is akin to aggravated assault, and since a bruised ego and a bruised rib are moralistically equivalent, they have no qualms about using direct physical violence in response to clearly non-violent, verbal or written criticisms of their ideals and declaring them acts of legitimate self-defense. The law means nothing, because the only civil code they believe in is their own feelings ... and if you slight those, no matter how indirect, they feel totally justified in taking physically aggressive actions.

This stuff happens all the time, folks. It happened recently at the University of Missouri, where black student government members responded to accusations that somebody said a racial slur by describing members of the Delta Upsilon fraternity as "fucking crackers" and "fucking rednecks" (yep, no irony there, whatsoever), threatening to burn down their home and physically trying to goad other students into fist fights. It happened at Swathmore College in Pennsylvania, where a student dropped out of school after she wrote an article in favor of more selective admissions policies in the campus newspaper and people threatened to cut her tongue off and left notes on her belongings stating "kill yourself bitch." (Thankfully, the university later apologized ... not to the student being criminally harassed, but for even running the "offending" article in the first place.) And it most certainly happened in Alabama, where 17-year-old Brian Ogle was mercilessly beaten by a gaggle of pro-Black Lives Matter activists, who allegedly stomped him into critical condition because he had the audacity to declare he supported police officers. Not that you would gleam as much out of The Washington Post's recent account of the incident, which - astoundingly - fails to acknowledge the minor was nearly killed by a gang of "nine to 60" African-American males. Call me cynical (I prefer the term "realistic"), but do you think all of these mass media monoliths would still be as mum on the details had the script been flipped, and five dozen white kids had shattered the skull of a lone black child in Dixie instead?

Which brings us to perhaps the ultimate display of this great transvaluation of values - the saga of one Duane Buck

On Oct. 5, the Supreme Court of the United States heard from Buck's attorneys, who argue that their defendant deserves a retrial because evidence was submitted in the trial from a psychologist, one Walter Quijano, who - citing indisputable data anyone can cull from literally a minute Googling FBI recidivism stats - said that Buck was likelier to re-offend than the aggregate felon based simply on the mathematically indisputable fact that black criminals, for whatever psychosocial reasons, are likelier to be re-arrested than whites, Hispanics or Asians

Well, in 2011 the state of Texas terminated its services agreement with Quijano, whose unabashedly racist inclinations towards statistically verified fact eventually led the state Supreme Court to grant retrials to several individuals who were convicted in cases in which Quijano supplied testimony. Now it's up to the high court to decide whether Buck, too, gets a second shot in the courtroom. Or as Chicago Tribune columnist/alarmist Leonard Pitts, Jr., put it? "If the state of Texas executes Duane Buck, it'll be because he is black." 


This is the world we live in, folks. We are rapidly approaching a social cosmos in which merely stating factually accurate data about racial discrepancies in behavior and outcomes are becoming cultural crimes on par with LITERALLY murdering people. Things are bad enough already, but unless someone - or something - manages to drop a serious load of common fucking sense on the aggrievement-addicted masses, we're slowly but steadily traipsing our way down the road to true Orwellian tyranny.

And this nightmarish American fascism won't be accompanied by the sound of clomping jackboots on city streets. Instead, I'd imagine it sounds like a rather innocuous speech emanating from the ivory lecterns of our most prestigious venues of higher education ... only with the cultural Marxist chestnut "deconstruct" replaced by the far more appealing verb "destroy."


Two stories, two continents, one overlying theme and two totally different responses from the global media

Now here's an interesting little social phenomenon. Let's say you have two stories that, all things considered, are about the very same thing - in this case, people saying some very pointedly racist things. Now, the variable here is twofold. In one instance, the scenario involves whites in the United States saying some very impolite and inconsiderate things about black people. And in the other? Well, it involves blacks in South Africa saying some very impolite and inconsiderate things about white people. The great global sin of "racial bigotry" being equivalent, one would assume that each scenario would receive equal play in the international media, with each instance being treated as equally lamentable and regrettable occurrences. Alas, the great stewards of international "news" really didn't see the point in highlighting one of the above-mentioned examples. Of course, publications the world over hopped on the story of two south Georgia cops who traded racially derogatory things with one another on Facebook (although I'm not entirely sure the U.S. Uncut headline "Georgia cops caught bragging about targeting black drivers in insanely racist Facebook messages" is necessarily an accurate summary of the episode. Or an objective one.) Of course, other outlets took a more sensationalist approach, but - with the possible exception of some fairly hyperbolic, loaded terms like "hunted" - these international publications are more or less circumstantially factually accurate in their no-doubt alarmist coverage.


And in this case, I would say the outrage is more than warranted. It's one thing to go after two civilians who drop the "n-word" in casual, private discourse, but to have two police officers text the term "niggs" to each other while on the clock? Forget the racist angle, the fact that those two lugheads were that stupid and careless is reason enough to fire their asses. And in the wake of this clearly prejudicial incident - which inspired worldwide ire - one just naturally assumes that there would be an equivalent amount of anger over #FeesMustFall supporters in South Africa, whom in addition to telling white students they have to join their campaign or else, have also been threatening their colleagues with voice messages declaring "at least one white student must die, whether male or female" in order to advance their vendettas? Well, think again - despite the very linchpin of the story being one ethnic group calling for the goddamn murder of a different ethnic group to achieve their political ends, none of the heavy hitters of global media - CNN and Al Jazeera or the BBC or even The Daily Mail - have gone anywhere near the story. In fact, there is a grand total of two articles about the incidents on Google News, and it appears that both of them are from South African publications. 

I just don't get it. I mean, it's not like there is a fringe populist oppositional party in South Africa gaining tremendous popularity under an initiative to involuntarily seize the property of white people, and whose official members have called for the actual genocide of Caucasians or anything like that, right? And there's certainly no longitudinal data demonstrating that whites in South Africa are being directly targeted in a staggering number of racist vigilante attacks, and for sure, no international genocide monitoring organizations have ever raised any concerns about the rise in virulently anti-white politics going on in the country. And without question, anti-white sentiment isn't so steeped in South African culture that the goddamn motherfucking president of the country has ever gone on live television to sing a song extolling the joys of killing white people.

How interesting it is that "journalists" the world over have accepted America's "epidemic" of racism - especially in the criminal justice system - as the God-given truth and fancy themselves on disseminating details about any and all events that back up that narrative, but they seem oh so hesitant to address the equally apparent reality of foaming, frothing, bordering-on-genocidal anti-white rancor pulsing through the veins of the South African consciousness? I guess that just means that some clearly racist examples of state oppression, apparently, are simply more worthy of discussion than others.


Trump detractors harp on The Donald for saying things Mr. Clinton actually did

It looks like the Hillary campaign's "October Surprise" came in the form of a 2005 Access Hollywood hot mic leak, in which Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said, among other things, that he was so wealthy and powerful he could hypothetically grab women by their vaginas and kiss whoever he wanted to because goddamnit, he's Donald Trump, that's why. He also discussed his failed efforts to bed a a would-be sexual conquest, who rebuffed his advances despite his noble attempt to woo her into the sack by ... taking her furniture shopping? To be sure, it's not exactly the kind of stuff you want going public during a presidential bid, but isn't it just a little hypocritical for Clinton supporters to tear apart Trump for his comments when the fucking spouse of the person they are rallying behind literally did the very things their sworn enemy discussed in a private conversation 11 years ago? In that, is there some sort of MORAL difference between someone engaging in chauvinistic behavior as a presidential candidate and someone engaging in chauvinistic behavior as ACTUAL president? And why in the hell is Donald Trump using the words "tits" and "pussy" considered a campaign-sinking matter when Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State included borderline criminal negligence with top-secret national security intel and verified destruction of evidence

Nope, no media bias here. Absolutely none.

Certainly, this shocking audio popping up the very same day as WikiLeaks dropping hundreds of emails revealing that Hillary favors open-hemisphere trade (the exact opposite thing she has claimed in numerous campaign stops), that even she thinks it's impossible to vet all Syrian immigrants adequately, that she wants to enact more stringent gun laws by executive order, she colluded with major media outlets to promote her campaign and that her top publicist considered half of the country "functionally illiterate," while an entirely separate leak revealed the Clinton Foundation may have received misappropriated TARP funds from big bank donors is all just a wild and woolly coincidence, right? Unless there's a goldmine of sexist Trump audio recordings out there just waiting to be cracked open ahead of election day, methinks the Clinton camp is going to have to stretch this latest Donald snafu out for as long as they possibly can. After all, just one percent of the total Hillary emails in WikiLeaks' possession has trickled out to date...


I couldn't have said it better myself, random friend of a friend on Facebook.


Tim Burton accused of racism after recent media comments

I've never really thought about it before, but there really aren't a whole lot of white folks in the Tim Burton filmography. I mean, yeah, there's Billy Dee Williams in the first (and still best) Batman movie, and uh, Michael Clarke Duncan ... playing a gorilla ... in the 2001 Planet of the Apes remake, but beyond that? His movies tend to be whiter than the most historically liberal states in the union. So in that, I really can't fault an interviewer asking Burton how come there's so little melanin in his films while doing a presser for his latest halfhearted cinematic cash grab (which, apparently, is an unabashed rip-off of the X-Men.) That said, Burton himself probably could've found a better way to phrase his response:
"Things either call for things, or they don’t. I remember back when I was a child watching The Brady Bunch and they started to get all politically correct. Like, OK, let’s have an Asian child and a black. I used to get more offended by that than just … I grew up watching blaxploitation movies, right? And I said, that’s great. I didn’t go like, OK, there should be more white people in these movies."
As you would imagine, the social media hordes didn't take kindly to Burton's willful refusal to kowtow to identity politics madness unabashedly discriminatory comments, with Twitter users in particular giving old poofy head the what-fer. Granted, I doubt intrepid reporter Rachel Simon would dare aver the thought of asking the very same "how come your casts aren't more diverse?" question to directors like Ava DuVernay, Kasi Lemmons and Charles Burnett, but the fact, stubbornly, remains: as you can no doubt see for yourself, the casting in Tim Burton movies remains almost blindingly white, aesthetically and thematically.

Now that's what I call white power. 

Let's hear it for absurd violence!

You know, collectively, we spend way too much time talking about our respective differences. I've long thought the absolute best way to mend our fractured, contentious ethnoracial strife, worldwide, has been to go the opposite route of the cloying, pandering, multiculturalism uber alles enforced diversity approach. Rather, if you really want to bring about a sense of pan-global racial equality, let's focus on the indisputable fact that - regardless of our sex, race, ethnicity, language, religion, color, creed, sexual orientation or gender identity - we can all be a bunch of sick, disturbing, psychopathic cretins, all worthy of the death penalty multiple times over. Don't believe me? All you have to do is take a gander at the following quick hit transgressions below and you'll promptly be reminded that when it comes to psychosexual, sadist pieces of shit, said pieces of shit truly do come in every color of the rainbow:



And perfectly demonstrating just how bad things have gotten? It's so bad that now, Denzel Washington is beating up Aretha Franklin and the cowardly mainstream press won't even cover it. Pssh ... the fourth estate, my ass

Higher education continues to lower expectations for future of humanity

These days, the problem isn't finding stories about colleges and universities employing borderline fascist, free expression-squelching and ironically prejudicial policies in the name of political correctness. Indeed, the rub is in finding a way to limit the most recent buffet of madness before us into a single paragraph. Alas, we here at The Internet Is In America always put our best foot forward, especially when it comes to highlighting the litany of ways academia is turning the minds of tomorrow's professionals into totally unemployable, wannabe-radical mush - so grab yourself a plate and dig into the SJW smorgasbord , why don't you?



Alas, there does appear to be a silver lining in the clouds, folks ... and oddly enough, it comes in the form of the tea-sipping, ultra-liberal frosh at York University. Forced to undergo an "expected" but not technically mandatory "sexual consent" class, about a quarter of the university's first-year students walked out of the 10-minute course, which was described by many students as "patronizing" (well, technically, "patronising," since those Limeys don't know how to use the letter "z," for some reason.) "There is no correct way to negotiate getting someone into bed with you. In suggesting that there is, consent talks encourage women to interpret sexual experiences that have not been preceded by a lengthy, formal and sober contractual discussion as rape," declared one irked freshman. "If students really need lessons in how to say yes or no, then they should not be at university."


New video game allows players to experience the vicarious, virtual thrill of a race war

Operating a website that, at last estimate, is at least 40 percent content concerning old school video games, I am often asked why I don't give a toot about contemporary gaming. Overlooking the numerous articles I've written over the years explaining why, one of my primary grievances with today's video games is that they've gotten way too full of their own bullshit. They can't just be content with being fun and entertaining diversions, now they've got to justify their own existence with some sort of cornball "social commentary." To be fair, sometimes, this works incredibly well - indeed, I've long considered the Grand Theft Auto games to be the greatest overall American satirical work since the heyday of All In The Family. Alas, for every halfway decent "seriously, we want to be considered real works of art" game like Spec-Ops: The Line and Men of Valor, you also get about 40 or 50 stupid "indie" games with minimal gameplay and plot motifs about immigration policy and milking your over-diagnosed mental health disorders for all they're worth in the Great American Victimization OlympicsSo enter Mafia III, the latest entry in a fairly mediocre video game franchise that has tried and largely failed to imitate the success of the GTA series. This latest game is set in New Orleans in the late 1960s, and wouldn't you know it, you play as a heroic black Vietnam veteran who gets treated like dog shit by a bunch of gloriously one-dimensional "redneck" antagonists, with several in-game missions calling for the complete and utter elimination of the rebel-flag waving "Dixie Mafia," a gaggle of sister-pimping, thick-drawled, "n-word" spouting ne'er-do-wells with intonations so stereotypical they might as well be racial epithet hurling Elmer Fudds. Alas, despite the game itself primarily focused on the criminal exploits of an African-American assassin who mercilessly murders scores of Haitians, police officers and "good old boys" for horning in on his nefarious black market doings, the developer of the game felt the necessity to issue a stern warning at the beginning of Mafia III - not for the bloodthirsty, self-righteous, homicidal vigilantism, but for the bad guys occasionally dropping racial slurs.

Quite possibly the most profound thing ever said on Reddit.

There is absolutely no reason to ever think about visiting Roger Ebert's old website

Roger Ebert is one of those guys I admire and despise in almost equal degrees. To his benefit, his writing style greatly influenced me and even now, I often churn through busywork while old episodes of Siskel and Ebert at the Movies play on YouTube. Alas, while more often than not I agreed with his assessment of films, when he was off the mark, by golly, was he wrong every which way from Sunday. Indeed, in his scathing reviews of all-time degenerate cinema classics like I Spit On Your Grave and Goodbye, Uncle Tom, he can't help but let his personal politics creep into the "critique," which usually became some sort of slobbering screed against whatever tons o' fun considered to be "racist" or "misogynistic" (and in case you are wondering how entrenched his pioneering SJWarrior-dom was, keep in mind he once said Predator 2 was meant to capitalize on white people's fears of inner-city blacks.) Alas, despite his televised stance against political correctness, the palpable influence of Ebert's pioneering virtue signaling is GLARINGLY apparent at the vestiges of his old website, which since his death in 2014, has been taken over by a small armada of progressive-liberal types who have turned literally every movie review assigned to them into some sort of sociocultural activist mission. The blatant, self-aggrandizing propaganda has been in full swing as of late, with all of the following enlightening critiques being shat out on the Interwebs as of late:


Note, all this stuff was taken from just one week of reviews. Now tell me this, folks: if the cult of Cultural Marxism is so strong and so pronounced in the hearts, minds and souls of the media that they can't even review stupid, throwaway kids movies without turning it into a vehement attack on wholly fabricated cultural constructs like "white privilege" and "toxic masculinity," just what kind of societal endgame are they REALLY pushing for here?


Rapper draws controversy for stating he doesn't think racism is a major social problem

To be honest, I don't know a whole lot about Lil' Wayne, but judging from his glorious refusal to adopt the popular herd mentality without once stopping to critically think whether the tagline is even true, I reckon I might just have to add me some of his tracks to my iPod. In a recent interview with Skip "literal cancer" Bayless, the mastermind behind such endearing tunes as  "Pussy Monster," "Pussy, Money, Weed," and "N.O. Nigga" was asked his thoughts on racism in contemporary U.S. society. Much to the shock and horror of millions around the globe, the tender-hearted lyricist behind "Nigga wit Money" responded with "these 33 years have been nothing but a blessing. I have never - and never is a strong word - never dealt with racism." Naturally, rather than let an adult black man come to his own conclusions about the world, the paternalistic liberal media has decided to take Lil' Wayne to the proverbial woodshed, with USA Today's Maeve McDermott describing the rapper's comments as "a classic case of a celebrity conflating his personal, skewed-by-fame experiences with those of the general public" ... a rather turgid personal attack masquerading as journalism at least halfway explainable because McDermott is a classic case of an ideologue conflating her personal, skewed-by-identity politics dogma with the actual experiences of the general public.


Cop decides it's better to get beaten half to death by criminal than be accused of racism

Remember a couple of weeks back, when I told all you kids the story about the British teen who committed suicide after a photo of herself mimicking "Asian face" went viral? Well, if you ever needed further proof that society has gone on ahead and spiritually ordained "racism" as the ultimate cultural sin and an albatross worse for the white man than death itself, look no further than what happened in Chicago on Oct. 5. Responding to the rather routine incident of someone driving their car through a liquor store, a 43-year-old female officer was attacked by a 28-year-old Parta Huff, a man high on PCP (who, for the record, also had three previous weapons arrests) who then proceeded to literally beat her into a comatose state. “The offender struck a female officer in the face and body and then repeatedly smashed her face into the pavement until she was rendered unconscious,” Chicago P.D. Superintendent Eddie Johnson (who, as fate would have it, looks just like Carl Winslow) told the Chicago Sun-Times. "As I was at the hospital last night visiting with her, she looked at me and said she thought she was gonna die. And she knew that she should shoot this guy. But, she chose not to because she didn’t want her family or the department to have to go through the scrutiny the next day on national news.” A bystander described the incident unfurling: "He threw her down and he started punching her like she was  a punching bag," one eye witness claimed. "I've never seen a cop get hurt the way she [did.]" There you have it folks - we officially live in a world where our law enforcement officials, the very people designated by society itself to protect the masses from maddened crowds, have determined it's better for their well-being to let criminals COMMIT violent crimes than safeguard their own lives. No hyperbole, no exaggerations, they would literally DIE rather than be accused of even BASELESS racism now.  And if you think that's anything short of a national tragedy - if not the biggest indication yet that Pax Americana is on a downward trajectory - you're either an idiot or - the true victors in all of this anti-cop backlash - a goddamn criminal

...and a few headlines that speak for themselves...



Regrettable incident in Miami is but the latest in a long string of all out melees transpiring at Chuck E. Cheese restaurants across America

Liberals struggle with cognitive dissonance of Ruth Bader Gingsburg saying she thinks Colin Kaepernick's national anthem protests are "really dumb"

Trump supporters physically eject attendee holding "Pepe 2016" sign

Rich white liberals are totally against plans to rezone schools that would send their kids to shitty inner city facilities

To avoid offending indigenous peoples, efforts underway to rename province of British Colombia...

...while CBC talking heads demand Blue Jays play-by-play team refrain from calling the ALCS challengers "the Indians"

"Tranny granny" Halloween costume recalled from major retailers' shelves

European Union politely requests British press doesn't mention it when Muslims commit terrorist crimes

Bakery accused of racism for selling Oreos-flavored cupcake called "Mr. President" ... even though the owners of said bakery are Obama supporters and black themselves

Norfolk, Va. councilwoman says the judicial system has been infiltrated by the KKK

Muslim apologist explains why it's kosher to sexually assault 9-year-olds

Let's all celebrate cultural diversity as Covergirl begins sexualizing underage transgender models!

In Boston, 9-year-old shot while playing on a playground ... at one in the morning

Texas juveniles get their jollies setting 10-year-old special needs child on fire

Miley Cyrus literally allows concertgoers to finger her on stage

WikiLeaks confirms Clinton was in cahoots with major media outlets to promote her campaign, advocates for global trade behind closed doors, called Catholics and evangelicals "backwards," struggles to comprehend the needs of the middle class and met with "strategists" on the best way to (illegally) delay releasing her emails