Sunday, January 28, 2018

This Week in Social Justice Warrior-Dom (Jan. 29, 2018 Edition)

Trigger warning activated! Our biweekly recap of everything that irked, irritated and aggravated SJWs is back with a vengeance!

By: Jimbo X

Twitter engineers admit to practicing racial discrimination ON CAMERA but nobody gives a shit

If you've never heard of it before, Project Veritas is the name of James O'Keefe's ongoing undercover video series, which I suppose could be described as one part WikiLeaks and one part Candid Camera. Among other things, the undercover social media sting operation has uncovered sordid Planned Parenthood doings (including but not limited to the agency illegally selling fetus tissue for profit), rampant Medicaid fraud in six states and footage of CNN employees admitting that they're just making up Russian collusion bullshit to make Donald Trump look bad. Of course, O'Keefe is a hardcore conservative firebrand with an obvious ax to grind against the liberal establishment and all things cultural Marxist, so I suppose it goes without saying that you can't exactly take everything Project Veritas puts out there as objectively reliable. Still, the footage more often than not speaks for itself despite O'Keefe's hardline Republican leanings, and the organization's latest video expose reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that one of Silicon Valley's heaviest hitters is undeniably practicing racial discrimination writ large.

In addition to catching Twitter engineer Clay Haynes stating that the entire Twitter organizational structure is comprised of hardcore liberals more than happy to turn over President Trump's private messages to the Department of Justice - effectively, revealing preliminary plans for a literal government coup - the Project Veritas leak also includes some rather damning comments from Twitter engineers Pranay Singh and Mihai Alexandru Florea, who - as their names suggest - aren't exactly your garden variety beneficiaries of white privilege.

"Everything you send is stored on my server… So all your sex messages and your, like, dick pics are on my server now," stated Singh, a direct messaging engineer for the social media platform, in one video.“So, what happens is like, you like, write something or post pictures online, they never go away… Because even after you send them, people are like, analyzing them, to see what you are interested in, to see what you are talking about. And they sell that data."

So not only is Twitter keeping a secret dossier on your private messages, they're then turning around and selling your online data - that you thought was private - to advertisers hell-bent on cyber-stalking you at every turn. Hyperbole, you say? Well, considering that's precisely what Twitter software engineer Florea states in one video, I reckon it ain't.

To actually charge the advertisers the money we have to prove it was you, and that’s why [we're] using email addresses, or like a cookie or something that can track you,Florea confessed. “You’re paying for the right to use our website with your data basically.”

Alright, so we have indisputable evidence that one of the most powerful titans in Silicon Valley is a.) trying to directly influence federal politics, including colluding with state actors to bring down democratically elected officials, and b.) quite possibly illegally mining consumer data and selling it to third parties without their consent. Now, those two news items alone ought to send a shiver down our collective spines, but just you wait - we haven't even got to the best part yet.

Project Veritas was able to get no less than eight current and ex-engineers at Twitter to admit - on camera - that the company is practicing ideological censorship in an orchestrated attempt to drown out any opinions antithetical to their own hyper-globalist progressivist Tao. And they're doing so by means of "shadow banning," which more or less represents a form of consumer fraud. 

“One strategy is to shadow ban so you have ultimate control," stated former Twitter employee Abhinov Vadrevu - a man who appears to be a member of a marginalized minority group whose annual household income is only $50,000 more than the aggregate white family in these United States. "The idea of a shadow ban is that you ban someone but they don’t know they’ve been banned, because they keep posting and no one sees their content. So they just think that no one is engaging with their content, when in reality, no one is seeing it.”

Oh, and Twitter is also using automated programs to monitor and remove content. "Every single conversation is going to be rated by a machine and the machine is going to say whether or not it's a positive thing or a negative thing," said engineer Steven Pierre. "It's not going to ban the mindset, it's going to ban, like, a way of talking."

It's a point echoed by Olinda Hassan, Twitter's Trust and Safety Policy Manager. "We're trying to get the shitty people to not show up," she said. "It's a product thing we're working on right now."

Prey tell, who are these "shitty people" the suits at Twitter are so concerned about? Well, as the aforementioned Singh - again, an individual who is most certainly not a Caucasian - puts it, right-leaning white people.
Yeah you look for Trump, or America, and you have like five thousand keywords to describe a redneck," Singh said. "Then you look and parse all the messages, all the pictures, and then you look for stuff that matches that stuff.”
So, yeah, we just heard a high ranking employee for a major technology company use a racial slur to describe how his company is intentionally and systematically discriminating against clients based on the literal color of their skin.

Let me repeat that. An employee for a company with an estimated worth of $2.5 billion and one of the most important communications channels in the world just said his employer is knowingly, willingly and proudly violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Employment Opportunity Opportunity Act of 1972, and most certainly the Civil Rights Act of 1991 - more specifically, Title I (2)(B), which explicitly prohibits all racial discrimination in the "making and enforcement of contracts," which entails, among other things, "the termination of contacts and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms and conditions of the contractual relationship."

This thing should be an international scandal of absolute shitstorm proportions, but the mainstream media and even D.C.'s legislators - not to mention all of those self-righteous "anti-racism" advocates and activists all over the country - aren't saying a damn thing about Twitter's confessed racial persecution. Of course, if Twitter's engineers had said the same thing about purposefully keeping blacks, or Jews, or homosexuals or any kind of in-group that isn't white off its services, you better goddamn believe their would be outrage on a global level. 

The media makes a mountain out of a shithole

The problem with covering the latest and greatest media backlash against Trump is that, by the time you finally get around to writing about it, nine times out of ten some new made-for-TV brouhaha has emerged and everybody who was livid about the last topic have totally abandoned it to focus all of their ire on the newer topic. Case in point? About a fortnight ago, the liberal masses were fuming over the President's alleged declaration that places like Haiti and Africa are "shit holes" (or "shit houses," depending on whose account you trust) and that he'd strongly prefer the U.S. get more immigrants from Norway than, say, The Democratic Republic of Congo or Gambia. Of course, there is no audio or video recording of the statement, so Dems are pretty much freaking out over the congressional equivalent of high school hearsay. Naturally, the secular progressive vanguard came out in droves to attack the President for his crypto-racist remarks, with five star virtue signalers like Conan O'Brien going as far as to host a telecast from Haiti to prove, unequivocally, that the nation isn't a "shit hole" - even though the slums of Port-Au-Prince are currently inundated with literal doo doo floods every time there's even moderate rainfallOf course, Trump's detractors haven't exactly done a bang up job refuting the Commander in Chief's purported disses, nor have they even mulled the idea - if not objective reality - that Africa and Haiti are indeed locales well-known for corrupt government, horrible infrastructure, incredibly low educational attainment rates, extreme poverty and - yes - substandard sanitation systems, with more than half of all Africans living in cities and villages without any kind of sewage coverage whatsoever, which, definitionally, would make them the text book illustration of a "shit hole." No, the liberal narrative is that Trump doesn't want African or Haitian refugees because they're illiterate, festering with disease and prone to raping infants as a voodoo cure for AIDS, by golly, it's because those people are all BLACK and The Donald just plain hates the P.O.C. Alas, the uproar was short-lived, thanks in no small part to a bigger story - the three-day federal government shutdown, largely revolving around D.A.C.A. - giving the liberals-in-name-only something more topical to piss and moan and get hysterical over (which, naturally, was supplanted by the "bombshell" New York Times report that claims Donald Trump tried to fire Robert Mueller last summer, which every other news outlet in the universe is reporting as la verdad despite the fact said NYT write-up is based on, and this is a direct quote from the Times themselves, "four people told of the matter.")

Meanwhile, in less pressing D.C. matters, Democrats voted unanimously to suppress an internal memo apparently exposing rampant unconstitutional spying conducted by the federal government under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which includes allegations that the Obama Administration may have illegally wiretapped Donald Trump associates during his 2016 run after all.

But surely, there's a good reason why the ABCs and CNNs and MSNBCs and New York Timeses and Washington Posts of the world never made a big hubbub about such damning intel, right?

Google A.I. STILL can't tell the difference between black people and gorillas

By now, we all know that Google is a borderline deranged hyper-liberal corporate cult, complete with company dogma demanding white employees feel guilty about it and mandatory lectures from rich lunatics who sexually identify as "yellow-scaled wingless dragonkin." Alas, their artificial intelligence programs - try as they may - just can't shake an inborn racial bias against the black folks. Back in 2015 a software engineer lambasted Google afters its proprietary Photos service tagged a picture of one of his black female friends as a "gorilla." Alas, the company algorithms still kept misidentifying people of the black persuasion as monkeys, apes, chimps and the aberrant orangutan, so Google recently decided to nip the problem in the bud by removing any and all search returns for gorillas in its Photos program. In fact, as one Wired expose found, the program has eliminated ALL results for search terms such as "chimpanzee" and "ape," while a search for "African-American" turned up a lone photo of a grazing gazelle.

Naturally, if Google is willing to remove innocuous photographs of lower primates as a safeguard against offending black people, it's really only a matter of time until they start censoring other things offensive to P.O.C. from their expansive, if not omnipresent, technological reach. A word to the wise, kids: you might want to do your research on "black on white crime" and "interracial rape statistics" while you still can.

The Nation warns its readers about the Alt-Right's latest trickery: using facts

In this day and age, the mainstream media has pretty much posited anybody who doesn't think white, Christian, heterosexual males should be publicly flogged and eventually eliminated from the human gene pool as members of the insidious - albeit absurdly hard to define - "alt-right," which is more or less this society's version of the old Scarlet Letter. Once that horrific label has been applied, good luck shaking it off and convincing any potential employers that you aren't a hardcore Neo-Nazi who wants all black people sent to the moon - indeed, in today's culture, being deemed a murderer or child molester carries less of a stigma.

Enter the clearly unbiased The Nation scribe Khalil Gibran Muhammad, who in a recent op-ed masquerading as objective journalism decided to warn all the "goodwhites" and minorities of America about the newest insidious tactic of the scurrilous "alt-right" menace: citing factual data.

In a meandering screed that applies appeals to emotion towards everything from The Trayvon Martin verdict to the Charlottesville, Virginia protests to the writing of Martin Luther King to Bill Cosby, Muhammad tries to guilt trip readers into believing that people like Ivy League educated, statistically-informed contrarians like Jared Taylor and Charles Murray are the future of white supremacists, not the stereotypical, morbidly obese, Confederate flag waving, sister-fucking, toothless, meth-smoking subhuman scum the media has endlessly posited as the bread and butter of so-called "white nationalism."
"Thus, by focusing their opprobrium on the Nazi next door, white liberals are missing the very real threat posed by a growing white nationalism," Muhammad writes. "These new white supremacists are coming not with Tiki torches but with reasoned arguments, buttressed by facts and figures, to make palatable racist ideas that many people, deep down, have always felt were true."
So, in other words, what Muhammad is saying is that the new vanguard of "white racism," are super-duper dangerous, because now they're extolling objective, irrefutable truth instead of just saying the 'n-word' a lot. And in true liberal fashion, instead of addressing the veracity of their factual claims that speak poorly of minorities, the author ignores those underlying issues altogether and suggests we figuratively shoot the messenger instead.

Today's teens are so stupid you have to tell them to NOT eat Tide Pods

You know, it's been a while since we've had a good, overblown, ridiculously over-reported moral hysteria involving America's gilded-yet-wayward youth, and the latest and greatest to capture our hearts and headlines doesn't involve such touchy topics as sex, drugs, or pouring vodka straight into their eyeballs. No, today's great social pandemic is the stark-raving fear that teens, tweens and elementary schoolers are being hospitalized in droves after doing something called the "Tide Pod Challenge," which apparently involves young 'uns putting the laundry detergent capsules in their mouths and biting them until the corrosive liquids inside pop out. Now, if you were to believe the incessant, raging coverage on ABC, CNN and the rest of the big media monoliths, you'd think that thousands of high schoolers were having their guts incinerated by harsh industrial chemicals day-in, day-out in these United States. Alas, actual data from the American Association of Poison Control Centers suggests that an astonishing 200 teenagers were hospitalized for "exposures to liquid laundry detergent pods," in 2017, with a grand total of zero fatalities - and no serious injuries, for that matter - reported. Sure, that's quite a few retards winding up in the E.R. with mild burns and upset stomachs, but it's hardly enough people to warrant a national crisis. Alas, our modern world being the overprotective clods we are, that hasn't stopped Google from pulling (or at least attempting to pull) all "Tide Pod Challenge" videos from YouTube, supposing that by taking away that appeal to infamy incentive, young, impressionable and frankly mentally underdeveloped children and teenagers won't have a reason to do stupid or dangerous things anymore, which they CERTAINLY never did before the Internet was a thing. Granted, it's quite telling that media Leviathans never address the core reason why kids today are doing such magnificently stupid things as smoking liquor, drinking hand sanitizer and choking one another with bicycle chains for sexual gratification. America, we don't have a Tide Pod problem - what we have is a dumb as dirt youth problem, and with it an even bigger horrible parenting problem

The Pope accuses alleged Chilean rape victims of lying, then gives props to a Dutch abortion activist and says gossiping nuns are worse than mass murdering Maoists

Back in the day, rhetorically asking if the Pope is Catholic was the equivalent of saying "no shit, Sherlock" or "well, duh, Captain Obvious." Alas, considering the peculiarly un-Catholic policy positions of the current head pontiff - which includes the rather questionable edict that atheists can enter into heaven just as long as they vote Democrat - many Catholics are actually questioning whether or not Pope Francis is even a Christian. Well, old Francis didn't do a whole lot to dispel those assertions when he traveled to Chile in mid-January to defend Bishop Juan Barros, a subordinate of the Rev. Fernando Karadima, whom the Vatican deemed guilty of sexually molesting countless young 'uns in 2011. Alas, despite ample evidence suggesting Barros was complicit in Karadima's crimes, the Pope nonetheless stood by him man, declaring the allegations that Barros is a diddler-enabler to be "calumny." Presumably under the impression that publicly supporting a probable pedophile wasn't enough bad press for one week, Francis immediately shifted gears by awarding Dutch politician Lilianne Ploumen the title of "Commander of the Pontifical Equestrian Order of St. Gregory the Great," which is reserved for individuals "in recognition of their personal service to the Holy See and to the Roman Catholic Church, through their unusual labors." And, my what "unusual labors" Ploumen has gone through to support the Roman Catholic Church, seeing as how she started a nonprofit to fund abortions for women who couldn't get government subsidies. If that wasn't enough, Francis wrapped up the week that was by telling a convent of cloistered nuns that gossiping clergy was worse "than the terrorists of Ayacucho" -  a communist guerrilla outfit that killed more than 60,000 Peruvians throughout the 1980s and 1990s.
No, for real - IS the Pope Catholic anymore?

An African-American pioneer: Cleophus Cooksey, Jr.

If there's one thing we here at The Internet Is In America hates, it's undeserved racial stereotypes. For example, there's been a longstanding misconception that there are no noteworthy serial killers of color in these United States, a pseudo-assertion that couldn't be any further from the truth. There's Henry Louis Wallace (responsible for ten rapes and murders in North Carolina in the early 1990s), Carl Eugene Watts (suspected of killing more than 100 women, the bulk of them white, in Michigan and Texas), Chester Turner (suspected of killing more than 100 women over a ten-year span in California), Paul Durousseau (whose seven victims include two pregnant women), Lorenzo Gilyard (a serial prostitute murderer in Kansas City) ... aye, the list doth go on and on. Well, today's black youths hankering for a homicidal role model have a new hero to idolize in the form of one Cleophus Cooksey, Jr., a 35-year-old Arizonian-of-Color who police have charged with no less than nine gun homicides committed over a three-week span last year. As perhaps the first truly multicultural mass murderer of the Trump Administration, Cooksey took great care to diversify his victims, ultimately gunning down two Hispanics, two white guys, three black dudes and one black woman during his 21-day rampage.

Oh, and here's the best part - the cops already knew he was a murderer. In 2001, Cooksey was convicted of manslaughter stemming from an armed robbery gone wrong (as if an armed robbery could ever go right), for which he spent 16 years in the slammer. Which means just months after the convicted killer was freed from prison, he immediately started killing AGAIN. You know, there might be a lesson to be learned here - but good luck getting today's zeitgeist to recognize that, yes, there are indeed many black people in America who DESERVE to be in prison and never released

New CDC report reveals pretty much every Millennial female is on ADHD drugs

When I was in college, I was absolutely flabbergasted by how many students used Adderall, Ritalin and a litany of other "study drugs." Particularly, I was stuck by just how many female students HAD to use the drugs to do such rudimentary things as "sit and read a book for 20 minutes" or "go half an hour writing on the same topic." Well, the CDC recently crunched the numbers and determined that attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prescriptions filed by women ages 15-44 has increased a whopping 344 percent since 2003. And even more astounding, that rate has exploded by 700 percent for women ages 25-29. Far and away the most popular ADHD "treatment," per the Centers for Disease Control data, is Adderall, which far few too people in the U.S. realize is actually HARD amphetamine that's only a few carbon chains away from being fucking meth. Naturally, physicians are slightly concerned about the affects of ADHD drugs on pregnant women, with some studies already drawing links to Adderall use and infant seizures. But good luck convincing today's women to lay off the (likely taxpayer subsidized) stimulants - if their babies come out looking like the toddler from Eraserhead, I'm sure they'll still find a way to blame "the patriarchy" and not their own pathetic reliance on pharmaceuticals to conduct the most mundane of daily tasks.  

California Attorney General says he'll imprison employers who comply with federal immigration laws

The Golden State - where people with AIDS are allowed to donate blood, politicians are trying to pass laws that would force companies to hand over non-taxable revenue to fund state projects and a new "automatic voter registration" driver's license program is destined to give thousands (millions?) of undocumented immigrants the theoretical ability to illegally participate in federal elections - isn't even trying to mask the fact that it's probably less than ten years' away from becoming a legitimate communist kingdom, if not Northern Venezuela. Helping expedite the transition to third world status is state Attorney General Xavier Becerra (like you need me to tell you his party affiliation), who recently warned California employers that if they comply with ICE officials during a series of planned illegal immigrant stings, he's going to throw the proverbial libro at them. During a Jan. 18 press conference, Becerra said "we will prosecute those who violate our law," referring to AB 450, a state provision that outlaws "providing voluntary consent to an immigration enforcement agent to enter nonpublic areas of a place of labor unless agent provides a judicial warrant, except as specified."

So basically, Becerra is brazenly ignoring the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution and boldly, unconstitutionally prioritizing state-level law over federal law ... which, of course, means California liberal will never, ever criticize Alabama and Mississippi for championing "state rights" again, no? Eh ... all I can say is that there's a good fuckin' reason why half of Californians want to secede from their own state.

So fed up with 'racism' in America, scores of black people actually are going back to Africa

Even though the website is called The Internet Is In America, analytics data proves that about 60 percent of our readers hail from outside the United States. As such, I feel it is my authorial duty to explain some of the more unique linguistic quirks of our fine nation and society to those who live in places that aren't called the U.S. of A. Case in point? A popular expression among individuals who do not have much of a fondness for black people here is the phrase "Go back to Africa," which references the fact that most of the native blacks in the country today are descendants of African slaves, predominantly those who got caught up in the Atlantic Slave Trade, and that said country would be better off if said blacks were to return to their continent of origin. Well, apparently, that's stopped being a figure of speech and become welcomed advice in Trump's America, as thousands of black Americans have recently volunteered to return to Africa to escape what they believe is unbearable systemic racism here in the States.

As Al Jazeera reported in a Jan. 18 article, an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 black Americans have voluntarily repatriated to Ghana's capital city recently, among them one Muhammida el-Muhajir, an ex-New Yorker who moved to Accra because she was tired of having to "prove herself" in America. After describing legit billionaires Oprah and Jay-Z as "second class citizens" and openly stating that Ghana still has a pretty big classism problem, el-Muhajir drops this little humdinger of a quote to rationalize her return to the mother continent:
"I don't want people to think that Africa is this magic utopia where all your issues will go away," she said. "It's just that some of the things you might face in America as a black person - you won't have to suffer with those things here. You might not have electricity, but you won't get killed by the police either."

Well, there you have it, folks. White oppression is so bad in America that living in a country where half the populace makes less than $4 a day and only 14 percent of its inhabitants have access to proper sewage systems is objectively better than living in one where even the absolute poorest citizens are guaranteed air conditioning, government-subsidized junk food and free money every time they get knocked up. That is, if el-Muhajir's thesis is even true, considering Ghana's police seem to have the same problem gunning down black teenagers as our boys in blue have in these United States. 

But in case you haven't figured it out now, the rub isn't that black people are getting killed, it's that they're getting killed by white people. Apparently, the black folks are just fine and dandy with the idea of being mortally wounded JUST as long as the person pulling the trigger is the same color they are.

So here's hoping that el-Muhajir and the rest of those new Liberians find all the joy and happiness and freedom in West Africa that they were never afforded here in America. Although, if I were a betting man, I'd roll the dice on them getting nothing but malaria, AIDS and possibly executed because the locals think they're witches instead.

... and a few headlines that speak for themselves ...


Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.