Sunday, February 17, 2019

This Week In Social Justice Warrior-Dom (Feb. 18, 2019 Edition)

Trigger warning activated! Our biweekly recap of everything that irked, irritated and aggravated SJWs is back with a vengeance!

By: JimboX

California legislator wants to do away with sex offender registration if the victim is a mere 10 years younger than the offender

The name Scott Wiener may not ring a bell, but you’re probably well aware of at least one piece of legislation he’s managed to get passed as a member of the California General Assembly. Probably his most famous bill was one he proposed a while back, demanding the governor repeal a law that made it illegal to infect people with AIDS.

Now, I know what you’re thinking — “Come on, ol’ Jimbo, that can’t possibly be a real thing.” While, not only did Senate Bill 239 pass the Legislature, it even included a provision allowing HIV-people to KNOWINGLY donate their tainted blood and blood products to public health collection agencies  … and since it’s Cuckafornia we’re talking about here, of course Gov. Jerry Brown signed it into law.

So, how in the hell do you possibly top decriminalizing the act of intentionally infecting people with an incurable sex disease? Simple, folks — for his next act of legislative tomfoolery, now Mr. Wiener is proposing a bill that would prevent people who do really gross things with minors from having to register as sex offenders just as long as the age gap isn’t greater than 10 years.

Which means, yes, per Wiener’s proposal, a 25-year-old can molest a 16-year-old and never have to register. I know you think I’m joshing you here, but for the sake of total transparency, I’m posting the entirety of the proposed legislation — Senate Bill 145 — below for you to gander at in amazement:

SB 145, as introduced, Wiener. Sex offenders: relief from registration. Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35, as approved by the voters at the November 6, 2012, statewide general election, requires a person convicted of one of certain crimes, as specified, to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California, as specified. A willful failure to register, as required by the act, is a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the underlying offense. This bill would authorize a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 290.55 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 290.5, to read: 290.55. (a)  A person convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (b) may, by writ of mandate, seek discretionary relief from the duty, imposed as a result of that conviction, to register  pursuant to the act if, at the time of the offense, the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor, as measured from the minor’s date of birth to the person’s date of birth. (b)  This section applies to the offenses described in subdivision  (b) of Section 286, subdivision (b) of Section 287, Section 288.3, and subdivisions (h) and (i) of Section 289.

Of course, even Wiener — who looks exactly the way you’d imagine him to look — has his limits, so the SB 145 provisions wouldn’t apply to anybody that commits sex crimes against victims under the age of 14. Naturally, Wiener says this proposal is necessary to (what else?) fight systematic homophobia in California’s sex crime statutes. Let’s let Wiener himself describe the intent and import of SB 145, why don’t we?

Yeah, there’s no way to spin this ‘un, guys. Wiener wants to alter state law so that 25-year-old men can bugger the literal shit out of 16-year-olds and not have to worry about being placed on a sex offender registry. This is no slippery slope argument, it’s literally the stated goal of the legislation. And from there, the sky — or more accurately, the underage anus — is the proverbial limit. Why not extend the “age gap” exception from 10 years to 20, or 30? Hell, for that matter, what’s stopping pro-pederasts like Wiener from pushing for the decriminalization of statutory rape laws altogether?

The Overton Window keeps moving closer and closer to the absolute left every day, folks. And if you think the so-called “gay lobby” doesn’t have its eyes firmly focused on the grand prize of normalizing pedo-hood, clearly you haven’t been paying attention.

Mass media comes to a consensus: Liam Neeson being upset about interracial rape is considerably worse than actual interracial rape

While promoting his latest movie — which isn’t Taken, but has a plot really similar to Taken, albeit with the international human traffickers replaced by opioid dealers — Liam “Oskar Schindler” Neeson gave an interview to The Independent in which he recounted the story of a close acquaintance in Ireland was raped by a black man. So incensed by the horrific crime, Neeson said he spent about a week afterwards roaming the city streets at night, carrying a cosh at his side in the hopes that some “black bastard” would assail him.

“I come from a society – I grew up in Northern Ireland in the Troubles – and, you know, I knew a couple of guys that died on hunger strike, and I had acquaintances who were very caught up in the Troubles, and I understand that need for revenge, but it just leads to more revenge, to more killing and more killing, and Northern Ireland’s proof of that,” Neeson told the interviewer. “All this stuff that’s happening in the world, the violence, is proof of that, you know. But that primal need, I understand.”

Well, unsurprisingly, the internet hive mind didn’t take a liking to Liam’s admission, and it wasn’t long until publications like Vox were taking Neeson to task for porting about “racist murder fantasies,” which, of course, are totally different from the “racist murder fantasies” ported about by rappers like Nick Conrad, whose oeuvre includes a song about literally wanting to go into nurseries and kill as many white babies as possible, as well as the racist and sexist murder fantasies ported about by left-leaning writers like Sarah Jeong, whose long string of virulently violent diatribes against white men so horrified the New York Times they decided to give her a job AND play online defense force for her when people started calling her out on her bullshit.

Naturally, people are already declaring Neeson’s “confession” to constitute a form of career suicide, but only time will tell if “Darkman” himself recovers from the bad press. Interestingly enough, the mass media monolith and today’s hyper-aggrieved Twitter hive mind seems far, FAR more upset over Neeson being upset over a loved one being raped than they are the actual fact that one of Neeson’s loved one’s was raped in the first place.

Trump-hating video game-maker busted in Super Bowl pedo sting

Like many, many transplants to the Neo South, Thomas Cheung appears to have been a blowhard liberal hellbent on changing everything about traditional Georgian culture in the name of gentrification … I mean, progressive enlightenment. Even worse, Cheung had the most insufferably millennial job imaginable — he was a “community specialist” and professional Twitcher for suburban Atlanta-based Hi-Rez Studios, the makers of that there “Smite” vidja game. And although you REALLY don’t need me to tell you this considering Cheung is a purple-haired Asian person who video games for a living, of course he was liberal AF, complete with a Twitter feed filled with self-patronizing hatred of President Trump’s military policies, border security initiatives, and incessant pimping of miscellaneous “save the children” programs online ‘cause it made him look like someone who was just plain nice and all around decent.

Alas, in real life, Cheung turned out to be exactly the kind of person you need to save the children FROM, as he was among 21 people arrested during a Super Bowl sex trafficking sting in Atlanta late last month. Apparently, the 32-year-old was having Whisper chats with someone he believed to be a 14-year-old girl, who — of course — was actually an undercover agent. He arranged to meet her at a Brookhaven Kroger around 1 a.m. on Jan. 31, when he was apprehended be agents involved in the Southeast Fugitive task force. Of course, it’ll be awhile before Cheung gets his day in court (odds are, he’ll wind up taking a plea deal of some sort), but under Georgia law he’s facing a maximum sentence of 20 years.

And have mercy, I can only imagine the LULZ that would come about from a guy who looks like THIS getting thrown into a federal prison with legit Neo-Nazis and Nation of Islam murderers.

Black people are mad at Adidas for releasing an all-white shoe for Black History Month

In case you haven’t realized it, February is indeed Black History Month, that wonderful time of the year where we celebrate our more melanated kindred for things like inventing peanut butter and the Super Soaker, even if white people actually invented them first. It’s also an opportune time to reflect on the oh-so-subtle differences between Americans of the African persuasion and those of the more Caucasian variety, like the oft under-reported fact that blacks people in the U.S. tend to spend 30 percent more moolah on clothing than white people. And if you thought such avid consumers of footwear and unabashedly tribalistic identity politics were going to give Adidas a free pass for their limited-time-only “Uncaged” shoe to mark Black History Month, you thought wrong.

As part of the shoe monolith’s Harlem Renaissance-inspired line of footwear, Adidas attempted to sell an all-white Ultraboost model — and since all things white are inherently bad, of course “Black Twitter”™ came out in droves to give the Germany-headquartered international the old what-for.

“Adidas could have gotten more creatives with that shoe,” said irate Twitterer @danayshiaavette, who also claims to be a “makeup guru,” which is really just a fancy way of saying “I’m shallow and plastic AF.” Continuing, she wondered aloud if the company could have celebrated “milestones of black history” instead, such as Rosa Parks and Sojourner Truth, instead of “having it all white with some cushion. WTF does that have to do with Black History Month?”

Of course, black people — the constantly oppressed, politically disempowered minority group they claim to be — are so marginalized that they ONLY managed to goad a multibillion conglomerate into recalling a product, in turn costing them untold millions in lost revenue, just to avoid even the slightest accusations of even inadvertent racism.

Speaking of “racist” footwear, Katy Perry begged for forgiveness after people online took offense to her line of shoes, which according to some, looked too much like a minstrel show character’s visage. This, on the heels of yet another “racist” apparel scandal involving a Gucci sweater that more incensed Black Twitter™  users took offense to, culminating in calls for boycotts from the likes of professional aggrieved midget Spike Lee.

Clearly, this effortless ability to bend international conglomerates to their knees is just further evidence of how little economic and social clout black people ACTUALLY have, and you’d have to be an unrepentant BIGOT to think otherwise. You racist.

Dems tell Muslim U.S. Rep. to STFU about Israeli lobbying influence

Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar of Michigan is no stranger to courting controversy. Indeed, long, LONG before she was an elected official, she was prone to saying all sorts of outlandish stuff on Twitter, like that one time she said “Israel has hypnotized the world” in 2012. And, of course, the Jewish contingent were none too pleased with Omar’s actions, when shortly after being elected to public office, she did an about-face and said she DID support the BDS Movement after all. But the proverbial dookie didn’t really hit the figurative floor until Feb. 10, when Omar had the audacity to not only acknowledge that federal legislators are being paid off by Israeli lobbyists, but LITERALLY name the Jew — so to speak — when she publicly accused AIPAC of buying off members of the U.S. House and Senate.

Well, despite there existing reams of conclusive, audio-visual evidence indicating such influence is indeed very real, legislators on both sides of the aisle came out of the woodworks to berate Omar for her clearly bigoted remarks. In fact, none other than Nancy Pelosi herself felt the need to give Omar a stern lecturing, declaring “Omar’s use of anti-Semitic tropes and prejudicial accusations about Israel’s supporters is deeply offensive” and that the Democratic Party, as a whole, “condemn these remarks and we call upon Congresswoman Omar to immediately apologize for these hurtful comments.”

And because she’s a good little goyim, of course Omar immediately backtracked, stating that she “unequivocally apologized” for offending her Jewish-American overlords … I mean, colleagues … just one day later.

Kamala Harris faces criticism for “selling out” and marrying white man

Despite sharing her first name with a famed WWF rassler’ who was canonically a cannibal from Uganda, Kamala Harris is indeed something far more unnerving — a career politican from San Francisco. And since she’s an empowered black woman, naturally the Democrats think she’s just the perfect foil for Donny Trump come 2020. Or, she would be, if it wasn’t for a skeleton or 600 in her political closet. Indeed, the DNC and its mass media appendages are already starting to turn against her, with CNN taking Harris to task for supporting a measure more than a decade ago  that would’ve forced San Fran authorities to turn over illegal immigrant youths arrested for crimes to ICE custody … which, naturally, in the eyes of modern day liberals, isn’t a plain-headed criminal justice policy, but literally another holocaust. Meanwhile, Kamala’s own “people” seem to be damn-damn-opposed to her presidential run for an entirely different reason: namely, the fact that’s she taking the BWC.

Oh, it’s true, alright. On an episode of The Breakfast Club — which I’m told is sort of like Good Morning America, but only for black people attending Ivy League colleges for free despite having high school G.P.A.’s 2.0 points lower than their classmates — hosts DJ Envy and Charlamagne tha God positively grilled Harris alive, accusing her of not being black-black because her parents were born in India and Jamaica and she attended high school in Canada. But the most caustic criticism came when the hosts brought up Kamala’s “decision” to marry — and therefore have the sexual intercourse — with not only a white man, but a man who by all objective criteria could quite possibly be considered the single whitest man in history.

“Look, I love my husband, and he happened to be the one that I chose to marry, because I love him,” Harris “defended” her spouse. “And he loves me.” Not addressed by CNN or The Breakfast Club, however? Any sort of inquiry into why so many African-Americans are concerned about the “legitimacy” of interracial marriage in the first place.

Pew Researchers: A Third of Americans Don’t Find “Blackface” All That Offensive

In the wake of Ralph Northam’s blackface brouhaha, the media has gone into full-on minstrel mania, trudging up as many instances of the white folks donning tar black visages as possible … of course, while steering clear of examples of their most beloved pro-Democratic Party backers like Jimmy Kimmel and Joy Behar gleefully pretending to be colored people of color (who are also colored.) But amidst all of the mass media bloviating and rabble rousing,  the results of a recent Pew Research study return some rather unexpected findings: namely, the fact that a good one-third of the U.S. adult society consider it generally acceptable for white people to darken their skin to complement Halloween costumes.

Even more surprising, perhaps, is that just 53 percent of black respondents told Pew’s researchers they thought white people donning shoe polish facials was always acceptable, leaving damn near 20 percent of Afro-American survey-takers stating they had little to zero objections over Caucasians painting themselves to appear visibly more negroidal in appearance. Interestingly, that little survey is part of a larger ethnographic study conducted by Pew, which also asked people of various racial and ethnic groups what they thought about people wearing the “traditional dress” of people from different groups as Halloween costumes. The results? A majority of American adults said it didn’t bother them a damn bit, with even 42 percent of African-Americans saying they weren’t even remotely offended by the notion of All Hallows Eve “cultural appropriation.”

Which, naturally, raises the question: if actual society doesn’t give a shit about this kind of stuff, how come the media is so hell-bent on making it seem like such is a bona-fide national outrage?

Yeah … it’s looking more and more like Jussie Smollett LIED about being the victim of a hate crime

When Empire star Jussie Smollett took to social media a few weeks back claiming to be the victim of a violent hate crime, the Twittersphere acted just as you’d imagine. Despite there being no physical proof of the attack, no audio or video evidence backing up Smollett’s accusations and nothing even close to an actual police report being filed at the time, the social media jihadists automatically accepted Smollett’s story as the truth, and by default, just further proof that Donald Trump has stoke white supremacist violence coast-to-coast in these United States.

Alas, despite all of the well-wishers and fawners Smollett has attracted on Twitter, there remains some … inconsistencies … with his account of the alleged attack. According to what Smollett initially told police, he was attacked by two masked men wearing Donald Trump hats who declared “this is MAGA country” — in the middle of goddamn Chicago, at two in the morning, with the temperatures below zero, in a neighborhood that’s about 99 percent black — and then proceeded to douse him in bleach and wrap a noose around his neck.

Yeah, even on its face it seems like an unlikely scenario, but that didn’t stop presidential hopefuls/unabashed race-baiters Kamala Harris and Cory Booker from automatically declaring Smollett’s attack to be a REAL “modern-day lynching.” Nor was it enough to deter Good Morning America from having a heart-felt interview with Smollet that desperately, direly tried to authenticate his description of the events, even after news was already circulated that — somehow — Smollett miraculously survived the alleged hanging and could be seen gingerly carrying a Subway sandwich back to his apartment just moments after the purported racial homicide attempt occurred.

And that, I’m afraid, was just the tip of the hate crime hoax iceberg. News later leaked out that Smollett appears to have hired two Nigerians to PRETEND to lynch him on the city streets of Chicago, purportedly because he was pissed about being written off his television show and figured nothing was as good for an ailing career as much as a good old fashioned lynching. Making matters worse, the Nigerian conspirators even KEPT the receipts for the rope used in the attack, because holy shit, are these people terrible at fabricating racist murder attempts.

As of publication time, Smollett’s case is rumored to be headed to a grand jury, where it looks like the only person who’s going to be facing any criminal charges is Smollet himself. Alas, even after presented with overwhelming evidence that Smollett not only lied about being mercilessly pummeled by Trump supporters who called him a “nigger” and “faggot” but STAGED IT to gain sympathy points on Twitter, ardent supporters like Ava DuVernay — the same melaninated Leni Riefenstahl that gave us the error-riddled “documentary” 13th — STILL support Smollett.

“Despite the inconsistencies, I can’t blindly believe Chicago PD,” she tweeted on Feb. 17. “The department that covered up shooting Laquan McDonald over a dozen times? That operated an off-site torture facility? That one? I’ll wait. Whatever the outcome, this won’t stop me from believing others. It can’t.”

So, in other words? Actual fucking reality doesn’t matter, she just plans on continuing to believe what she wants to believe, regardless of the empirical evidence, to keep up her “wh*te ppl evil” creation myth. So, uh, which group is truly the “hate-driven” one again?

Esquire under fire for doing a story about a heterosexual white teenager

"Such bravery telling the stories of those whose stories are the only ones we ever fucking hear," tweeted @emrezz, a social media prostitute with the handle "feminist next door." Indeed, so marginalized her opinion that it's indeed the top response to Equire's story.

Meanwhile, displaying a brazen inability to deduce meaning without someone directly telling her what to think, Twitterer @amy_v2 — whose handle is the almost too appropriate "I have no idea what is happening" — responded to the article with "I'm also not entirely sure if the article makes sense. What is the point of it? Am I stupid for not figuring that out or has it been badly written? What is it for? Who is it for? Is it so we see how awful white teenage American boys are? I DON'T UNDERSTAND."

And right on cue, here comes @irisorpi to come on in and tell it like it is ... that is, if you were a paranoid identitarian with a penchant for making mass generalizations about people you never actually interact with in daily life. "White men are welcoming to POCs in the sense that they only see POCs as meant to serve, benefit and prop up white men," she declares. "So they can underpay us, steal our ideas & claim it as theirs, vilify & criminalize us, then tell us we're talking [SIC] too much space."

Oddly enough, she has no problem doing so on a web platform invented by white men, on an international computer network designed by white men, running on a hypertext language invented by white men, on a physical device invented by white men, using electricity distribution applications and devices invented by white men, probably while living or occupying a building or some other infrastructure designed and built by white men. Oh, and as an aside, Ms. Iris Orpi? The only ideas women have worth stealing are recipes — and if we weren't too busy running the planet's complex economic and geopolitical machinery, our brownies would kick your brownies' asses, too.

Of course, the great big irony here is that the article itself isn't written by a white teenage boy, but Jen Percy, a left-leaning white woman who teaches at Columbia University and is probably Jewish or something.

Still, it’s awfully peculiar how just the mere SIGHT of a young white male drives so many aggrievement-addicted Twitter-feminists into a tizzy. By the way, isn’t there a term out that describes people who automatically assign arbitrary collectivist labels to individuals without their consent?

Media mourns latest mass shooting in America … then drops the story altogether after finding out the shooter was black

Despite the assertion that “white boys” make up a majority of America’s mass shooter, even New York Times research has determined that black people represent a grossly disproportionate share of the the mass shooting pie. Indeed, not only do blacks people — barely 13 percent of the U.S. populace, remember — make up the majority of mass shooters in the United States, they make up damn near 75 percent of them.

So while the aberrant Columbine or Newtown shooting gets all the press, the statistically-unavoidable reality is that, in this country, “mass shootings” aren’t just a disproportionately black “problem,” they’re an overwhelmingly black problem, which is something the mass media tries really, REALLY hard to ignore while desperately trying to convince the masses that the angry Caucasian incel next door is the true Second Amendment threat to society. Not that even that chestnut can withstand much scrutiny in the face of actual data, considering the lion’s share of those much-publicized mega body-count mass shootings are disproportionately committed by Hispanics like Nikolas Cruz, Asians like Seung-Hui Cho and Muslim fellas like Omar Mateen.

Still, hellbent on driving home their “armed white people are EVIL” narrative, the media collectively creamed their jeans when news emerged of a mass shooting at a factory in Aurora, Illinois. Indeed, the mass media monolith was just champing at the bit to trudge out its pro gun-control rhetoric to mark the one-year anniversary of the Parkland High Shooting, but all of that fell to the wayside when it was revealed that gunman Gary Martin was a black man, with a previous conviction for domestic abuse, who illegally possessed a firearm. And since that would force the media to admit gun control laws as is don’t work and that black people can often be murderously violent, of course they dropped the whole Aurora shooting angle in record fucking time.

Huh — if I didn’t know any better, I’d swear the whole gun-control moment was more preoccupied with disarming law-abiding whites than ACTUALLY preventing black-on-black gun murder. And the fact that nobody knows who the fuck George Banks, Aaron Alexis, James Edward Pough and Omar Thornton are — despite being among the deadliest mass shooters in American history — speaks VOLUMES about the real agenda going on here.

...and a few headlines that speak for themselves…


Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.