Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts

Friday, June 16, 2017

Fuck EVERYBODY Running for Georgia's 6th Congressional District

Republican, Democrat, it doesn't matter - representative politics is a load of hooey, and nothing demonstrates that better than this Tuesday's congressional runoff.


By: Jimbo X
JimboXAmerican@gmail.com
@Jimbo___X

I hate politics. But as boring and annoying as international geopoliticking may be, at least at has some cool stuff in it, like laser guided missiles and bacterial warfare. Unfortunately, you won't find robotic death machines and empty threats to invade rival nations to loot their precious natural resources in state-level politics, and you sure as hell won't see 'em in local level politics. Instead, you'll just hear a bunch of bickering and bitchin' about zoning ordinances and millage rates - i.e., topics about as interesting as the prospects of waxing your big toe. 

I should know that better than anyone, since I spent a couple of years covering local level government when I was a shittily paid reporter back in the day. There's no real way to adequately describe how boring it is to sit in city hall for six hours watching a whole bunch of cracka' motherfuckas' take turns debating the merits of increasing business license application fees and applying for block grants. I guess it's kinda' like sitting in a REALLY boring church service, except worse because at least at church you get some songs and if you're lucky, a wafer and a cup of juice. But when it comes to the great secular worship service, the only thing you get is uncomfortable seating and so much hot air, you kinda' want to run your hands underneath the podium to dry 'em off. 

Which brings us to my home state's 6th congressional district runoff - i.e., the most annoying fucking thing that's happened in Atlanta all year, and considering that also includes the time traffic was slowed to a crawl for two months because a crackhead set Interstate 85 on fire, that's saying a lot

Here's what you need to know about the state's 6th congressional district (and trust me, there ain't a whole lot for you to learn.) It encompasses a swath of about 700,000 people over a suspiciously arbitrary sliver of four different counties. The district is overwhelmingly white (about 72 percent of the total populace is mayonnaise colored) and stinkin' rich (the average household income is $72,000 - the average for the rest of Georgia is just $50,000.) Since 2000, the district has been more or less owned by Republicans, with Johnny Isaakson (now one of Georgia's U.S. Senators) and Tom Price (now the U.S. Health Secretary) being the only two men to represent the district over the last 16 years.

So, yeah, basically, it's been totally unwinnable RINO territory for liberals. That is, until this year, when this young up-and-comer named Jon Ossoff entered the race as a democratic challenger and actually won 48 percent of the vote - thus, facilitating a runoff against leading republican challenger Karen Handel on June 20. 

We'll get back to the specific candidates in just a bit. But first, we've got to talk about the national resonance of this particular election, which is apparently is so strategically important that even the fuckin' President of the United States is tweeting about it

Now, it's kinda funny that nobody gave a shit about the 6th district until recently. Remember, I lived and worked in the damn place for the better part of a decade, and nobody anywhere considered it a nationally significant congressional district. But all of a sudden, the fact that a dimmicrat might actually win the whole kit and caboodle has all them politicos in D.C. in a tizzy. After all, this is solid red clay Republican soil, and the idea of some lanky liberal coming in there and wresting the territory away from the conservatives just HAS to be a proxy referendum on Trump and a sign that the rural hoi polli are finally shying away from the G.O.P., right? 

Don't believe the narrative, kids. The way the national media has spun it, you'd think Georgia's 6th congressional district was home to NOTHING but MAGA-hat-wearing N.R.A. members with 17 different rebel flags on their trucks. Well, take it from somebody whose actually paid taxes in the district - that ain't the kind of "deep south" we're talking about here. 

Georgia's 6th district is basically a lily-white suburban stronghold, predominantly populated by out-of-region transplants. These aren't guys named Clem and Cletus who work on trucks for a living and spit tobacco on their kitchen floor. The aggregate 6th district voter is some guy named Chad or Gerald, who works as a financial planner or I.T. specialist for one of them big tech firms in Atlanta. He drives an Audi, he has 2.3 kids, and he was probably born in Pennsylvania or New Jersey. If by some chance he actually was born in the region, he almost certainly went to a big name SEC school and his family's wealth can probably be tied to owning a plantation at some point in their bloodline. Yes, he's more likely to vote republican than democrat, but he's anything but a populist. He's a firm believer in status quo, establishment conservative politics and he probably jacks off thinking about open trade and globalization when his wife is shopping at the latest and greatest "mixed use development" shopping behemoth. He probably doesn't own a gun, but he's in bed with Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio and the rest of their ilk because they'll keep his taxes relatively low and provide him plenty of opportunities to offshore or outsource jobs to guys named Habib instead of paying a local worker to do the same job at double the cost. 

So, in other words, most of the voters in the district are what we would call "elitists." They've got money, they've got wealth, they've got retirement plans and they're every bit as entitled and class-conscious as your average first-year liberal arts college social justice warrior. In that, it makes sense that so many of 'em would jump ship from the post-Trump G.O.P. and its populism uber alles message to the dimmicrats, whose anti-economic-nationalism platform is actually more attuned to their own financial wants than the republicans.

Then again, you might be wondering how some scrawny, Jewish, 30-year-old kid with a Brillo Pad haircut who's never held any kind of public office before could have ever been catapulted to take over Georgia's 6th congressional to being with. Well, there's a simple answer for that one: because a whole hell of a lot of democrats from out of Georgia are bankrolling him.

As in, the guy's received more than $8.3 million from liberal sympathizers, and just 5 percent of it came from in-state donors.  Irony of ironies, he doesn't even live in Georgia's 6th district and not only did he attend college out of state, he attended it out of country at the London School of Economics. 

Basically, he's the very definition of a neo-carpetbagger. He's LITERALLY being funded by democratic elites from the northeast and west coast to impose their political ideals on Georgia's native born (you know, the few left in the district who haven't been displaced by U.N.-approved ethnic cleansing "resettlement projects" and socially-engineered migration "cultural enrichment" programs.) His campaign is basically a putsch to enforce alien rule on a nominally sovereign community simply for the sake of bolstering the dimmicrats' voting power in congress. He has no idea what the needs of the community are and he doesn't care. He's just there as a liberal puppet, another warm ass in a seat in D.C. to help the dimmicrat agenda.

It's not surprising the attack ads against him have focused on that - something he hasn't even tried to refute in his own campaign clips. In one of the greatest things I've ever seen in my life, one anti-Ossoff ad brilliantly shows a whole bunch of stereotypical San Fran liberals talking at length about how happy they are to see Ossoff running in Georgia, complete with hippie chicks talking about how glad they are to see military spending cut because, in her words, "ISIS is overrated." There's also another good 'un showing Ossoff dressed up like Han Solo in college that busts his balls so hard that it's pretty much a guarantee that he's going to be pissing dust for the rest of his life. Needless to say, you need to see both of these things right fucking now:


The problem is, his opponent - 55-year-old, approximately 300-pound MIL-to-definitely-not-F Karen Handel - is every bit is annoying and full of dookie. If Ossoff is your dime-a-dozen liberal turd, Handel is the all-too-predictable republican counter-shit in the other stall that's just as damn stanky

Although Handel does have some experience in public office, it's not like her track record is that impressive. She's been Georgia's secretary of state and a member of the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, and before that, she was a veep of public policy for the Susan G. Komen for the Cure "charity" until they decided to start giving money to Planned Parenthood (she even wrote a book about it, but fuck it, nobody's got time to slog through that mess.) She also ran for the U.S. Senate in 2014 but (obviously) lost. She also ran for governor in 2010, but lost there, too. Basically, Handel is a bitch that loses a lot, but because she has kind of a brand name, the Republicans keep propping her up as *their-girl*. So basically, she's kinda' like John McCain, except I'd prolly have an easier time fucking him than her wrinkled, flabby, whale-hipped ass. 

As for the Ossoff counter-attack, they're basically saying she's a self-centered fat whore who spends taxpayer dollars on chairs and her own SUV and that she would - and this is a direct quote from one of the commercials - "fit right in in Washington." Of course, the Ossoff campaign never mulled the idea that if D.C. is a haven for self-serving turdwads, what does it mean when THEIR candidate wants to go there so much - but hey, by now, nobody expects consistency or logic in politics, especially down here in Georgia

Now right here I could give you a quick rundown on where the two candidates stand on issues like health care, military spending and the economy, but a.) you already know what they're going to think based on their political affiliations and b.) like you'd give a fuck, anyway. I'd like to say one of them is the lesser of two evils, but here, each candidate is especially annoying and irritating in their own unique way. Ossoff is literally there just to shoot down everything the Republicans propose in Congress (and possibly social engineer even more native Georgian jobs out of the market to appease his liberal bed buddies), and Handel is just a hammy Republican broad that brings nothing to the table and is going to swallow whatever crap the rest of the Republicans in Congress shat out without ever giving it a second guess.

The sad thing you realize with this runoff is that the concerns of the people who actually live in the area the candidates are representing is literally the least important thing in the minds of either Ossoff the Jack-Off or Karen (the floor can barely) Handel (her weight anymore.) This isn't about giving native Georgians their voice in federal policymaking, it's about the republicunts and demofags marching into our backyard and shoving these two dildo queens in front of us and telling us we need to vote for one of 'em because they'll help carry the red or blue flag of the Great Ongoing Political Culture War in that big old Thunderdome in D.C.

I know it's a drum I've been banging for a long time, but shouldn't we be doing shit truly democratically instead of this Mandaean "representative" bull crap? There's 700,000 people currently residing in Georgia's 6th district, and instead of leaving it up to old Brillo-pad-head or Thunder-thighs, why can't they directly vote in federal referendums? Shit, we don't even need senators or congressmen - every month, we'll just march on down to the polling precinct and pick apart the a'la carte legislative issues and let it come down to good old fashioned majority rules democracy. If we just have to have senators and congresspeople, at least limit their ability to make decisions. Sure, we'll vote you in to make laws on our behalf, but before any of that shit is official let the VERY PEOPLE YOU ARE REPRESENTING have the final say on what Capitol Hill is pushing through the sausage factory.

Representative democracy is, has and always will be a crock of shit, whether it's on the federal, state or local level. It ensures that party politics will always trump regional need, effectively signing away citizens' rights to lobby for their own interests. What we call "democracy" in the States is hardly anything more than an electoral war between dueling oligarchies, and nothing demonstrates the abject sadness of the system more than the two twats duking it out for control of Georgia's 6th district. 

So fuck Jon Ossoff, fuck Karen Handel, fuck everybody who's voting for either one of them and double fuck anybody who actually gave them campaign contributions. Neither Turd A nor Turd B is truly going to represent the hearts and minds of the people, and at the end of the day, absolutely nobody - regardless of their status as "elected official" - should be considered a proxy for your own voice.

Nobody - not no liberal democrat Jew or no fat ass republican she-beast - should lay claim to representing you on anything, and in that, no matter who wins on June 20, Georgia's 6th is hosed. Like thermonuclear war or Tic-Tac-Toe, the only responsible choice on Tuesday is to not vote at all, and if you run into anybody wearing one of those stupid "I'm a Georgia Voter" sticker, you have the Constitutional right to sock their shirt over their head and give 'em a Terry Funk piledriver

Every ballot cast - whether it's for a municipal city council seat or President of the goddamn United States - is a vote for politics as is and a ringing endorsement for elitism uber alles. "Representative democracy" is a scam, a scheme, a ruse and a shakedown, and anybody who's proud to forfeit their right to home rule direct democracy in order to promote some counterfeit political savior and his or her dogmatic devotion to the party line ought to be ashamed of themselves.

And the fact that human sanitary napkins like Ossoff and Handel are deemed good enough to represent the public in federal policymaking should tell you all you need to know about the utter futility of politics in these United States, don't it?

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

The Women's March Protests Are Totally Pointless

What "rights" are all you broads fighting for, anyway?


By: Jimbo X
JimboXAmerican@gmail.com
@Jimbo___X

Well, I figured I'd have to say something about all of this "Women's March" stuff eventually, so I'll hurry up, say my piece and leave all ya'll be.

To begin, let's go back to the Civil Rights Movement. Or, even more fitting, the Suffragette Movement. Alright gals, think very, VERY carefully here: what made those protests different from the ones you're doing today? 

Simply put: they were actually fighting for something concrete. The Suffragette Movement wasn't about fighting sexism or the patriarchy, it was a social movement to obtain a specific legal right - that being, the right to vote (although it is strange how history has seemed to have forgotten just how closely tied the Suffragette Movement was to the Temperance Movement, but hey, I'll let you do your own research there.) Same thing with the Civil Rights Movement. They weren't marching against racial discrimination, they were LITERALLY marching to overturn discriminatory legislation; the Civil Rights Act of 1964 didn't make racism illegal, but it did make a shit ton of Jim Crow laws - which formerly barred blacks from frequenting certain public facilities and even schools - illegal

Now, I want you to pay REAL close attention, girls. In one sentence, what concrete legal rights are all these marches you've been doing intended to obtain? What specific law - if any - are these marches meant to overturn, overrule or outright outlaw? 

Well, I hate to break it to you, husband-less cat-owners of America, but assembling by the hundreds of thousands to hold up signs reading "you can't comb over racism, homophobia, sexism, rape, Islamiphobia [sic]" doesn't actually constitute a concrete legislative demand. Unless, of course, the whole point of these marches is to drum up support for legislation that would make racism, homophobia, sexism and Islamiphobia [sic] illegal, at which point YOU would be the ones raping the United States Constitution

From what I've seen thus far, here's what I suspect the women's marchers might be trying to say:

  • Abortions are great, especially when they're free
  • Donald Trump is a big fat stupid doo-doo head
  • Smash the patriarchy so we can close the wage gap for good
  • Wah wah wah, Hillary didn't win and I don't know how else to react to not getting my way for the first time in my life

How women march for freedom vs. how men march for freedom.

Well, last time I checked, abortion is still perfectly legal and Roe v. Wade remains the law of the land. Granted, there's a pretty strong chance the Trump Administration could (and most likely will at least try) to cut funding to Planned Parenthood, but even if Congress DID manage to pass a bill saying no more federal moolah for P.P. - it STILL doesn't ACTUALLY outlaw abortion. Same thing if the Trump Administration tries (and it wouldn't surprise me if they did) to suspend any and all Medicaid funding for abortions. 

Roe v. Wade is still intact, skirts. The only difference is, instead of having taxpayers in Nebraska and Wisconsin unknowingly foot the bill for your latest de-fetusing, now you've gotta' pay for that shit on your own dime. You're not losing any Supreme Court bestowed rights, girls ... you're just liable to lose an entitlement (that being, publicly subsidized abortions) you're not legally or constitutionally obligated to receive in the first place. IF Trump and pals were trying to actively ram a bill through the House that outright banned abortions, you MIGHT have an argument. Unfortunately, "make other people pony up to have this thing scraped and vacuumed out of me" ISN'T a legally codified right anywhere, no matter how badly you wish it was.

The second bullet point is an even stupider aggrievement. Alright, so you don't like Trump. You think he's a sexist pig who might be a legitimate rapist, even though he's never been arrested for it (and certainly never charged with it, and doubly certainly never been convicted of it) and none of his alleged "victims" have ever come forward with concrete, tangible proof that he victimized them. Sorry, broads, but "I think he's an asshole" isn't a legitimate reason to remove him from office. To do that, he's actually gotta' do something that violates his oath as president, like, I don't know, lie before Congress about getting his dick sucked. Furthermore, what executive order has he signed thus far that literally deprives you of one legal right (sorry, but that's not the same thing as entitlement) you had Nov. 8, 2016? That's right, none, zip, nada. You're just as Constitutionally free as you were three months ago, and the fact that hundreds of thousands of you can assemble in the streets to yell "fuck you Orange Hitler" for six hours straight without having a tank run you over more than proves it

The third one is so stupid, I don't even know where to begin. First off, the patriarchy isn't real. It doesn't have a physical address, it doesn't have a newsletter and it doesn't have a secret handshake. I've had a penis for more than 30 years, and I've yet to be invited into this inner sanctum of domineering white men, whose sole purpose is to conspire and conjure up plans to suppress women and minorities. Furthermore, if the patriarchy is indeed real, how do you explain the fact that men make up a majority of the nation's homeless and almost ALL of the nation's incarcerated population? Why do women - across the board - receive lighter sentences than men for the exact same crimes? Why do women win primary custody of children in anywhere from 66 to 88 percent of all divorce hearings? Why do women earn a majority of the nation's advanced degrees and why do women own a majority of the nation's wealth? And for God's sake, why do men - regardless of race or ethnicity - tend to die almost five years younger than those with XX-chromosomes

Then there's the inevitable complaint about the so-called "wage gap." Remember the Equal Rights Amendment they tried passing back in the '70s? Well, it was shot down for a reason - it would royally fuck up the economy. Same job, same gender, same pay - sounds good, right? Yeah, until you realize it means a first year substitute music teacher would be guaranteed the same pay that a physics teacher with a Ph. D. and 30 years of experience makes. Would a female office manager who oversees 10 people be entitled to the same pay as a male district manager who oversees 10 offices? Would hospitals be forced to pay a part-time female ENT doctor the same wage as a full-time male brain surgeon? Aye, now you see why it never got off the ground


...in hindsight, was it really that wise of an idea to let them vote?

Oh, and that whole "77 cents for every dollar a man makes" chestnut? A buncha' bullshit made up by the AAUW to cajole weak-kneed department chairs into giving them tenure. And if you need further proof that the wage gap is a bunch of hooey, here's a couple of articles debunking it for you to read on your own time from such festering misogynistic shitholes as Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, Time and Forbes.

And the fourth bullet point is the way that perplexes me the most. Not unlike the Black Lives Matter fad from last year, this whole Women's March movement (although, really, it's more of a hashtag than anything else) isn't actually outlining a workable set of policy reform ideas, but rather, just providing a brand name for a disparate group of anger-fueled individuals to loudly display their moralistic outrage over intangible concepts as some sort of pop cultural hobby. Uh, how exactly does holding up signs wishing literally half the population death achieve a policy goal again? It literally doesn't do anything to get you any closer to legislative reform, but it DOES give you something to retweet and post on Instagram. And in today's virtue signalling driven social media-scape, the endgame is never action, but always sycophantic affirmation.

And does anybody else find it just a little crazy that seemingly NONE of these hos seem to be pushing for the elimination of the electoral college - you know, the one LEGITIMATE social reform movement aggrieved Hillary voters could've chosen as their pet project in the wake of Trump's election? 

Then again, drumming up support for changing the Constitution takes - what's that word again? Oh yeah, effort. Why attempt to change the legal mechanism that LITERALLY cost Hillary the election if it means having to do actual work when it's far easier to just put on a Meg Griffin cap and say the word "pussy" a lot instead? 

Speaking of "pussy," isn't it just a little hypocritical for all of these Women's Marchers to run around wearing vagina masks and dressing up like golden-showering promising penises as a statement about how incensed and offended they were the President said he could grab women by the cooters 12 years ago? Bitches, please. For once, try to think like a normal, God-fearing Middle American. Even if you are rightly offended by Trump's alleged pussy-grabbing, is bragging about copping feels in a private discussion really more stomach churning than forcing an elementary schooler to walk around wearing a sign that says "this pussy bites back?" Dudettes, I'm sorry, but I'm honestly MUCH more disturbed that somebody would not only refer to their own primary school aged daughter as a crude sexual euphemism, but proudly parade her about in public as a political tool than I am any of The Donald's purported crotch grabbings. 
Feminists, seen here displaying why none of their candidates will ever win anything again.

Say what you will about the Tea Party dingbats - and yeah, it's probably valid - but at least those Obama hating crypto-racists had actual goals in mind. They wanted three concrete things: less taxes, less federal debt and no Obamacare. Those aren't invisible social constructs like "sexism" or "misogyny." They are actual pieces of public policy that can be changed over and over again. 

So, again, Women Marchers, I have to ask: what legal right that you do not have that men do ARE you fighting for? What specific federal law are you trying to get rid of or substantially alter? Which federal laws are you trying to bring to fruition? 

That's the problem with you dames. You honestly have no clue what you're marching for, you're just pissed your candidate didn't win and you have no idea how to handle electoral defeat

And you know what the really ironic thing about this is? Gals, this is PRECISELY the reason you lost the election in the first place. You're literally parading about your schismatic identity politics before everybody in America, in an attempt to divide instead of unite. You ovulators totally forgot that it was Donald Trump who managed to win over what could've been Hillary Clinton supporters instead of the other way around. Sure, 750,000 women in the L.A. area may have attended one of your rallies, but you completely forget that another 5.5 million women in that very M.S.A. stayed at home. A good 42 percent of ALL WOMEN in the U.S. voted for Donald Trump, and instead of doing something constructive to win them over to your side, you've doubled down on trying to ostracize, alienate, ridicule and demonize them (i.e., the pro-life women's groups that were disinvited from the "festivities" in D.C.)

Although politics tends to make people pretty damn oblivious to the real world and trifles like logic and common sense, there are some things that even the staunchest of partisans has to shake his or her head at - even when it's being perpetrated by people on "their side." And really, these women's protests - perhaps the first protests in history without anything corporeal actually being protested - are doing a remarkable job of driving middle of the road Democrats over to the G.O.P (hey, they don't call it the "red pill" for nothing.)

For starters, it's hard to not pick up on the brazen hypocrisy of the "movement" (which, to be perfectly honest, is much more of the bowel variety than the civil rights arrangement.) OK, so these twats are furious that women's rights in these United States are somehow being eroded, but when it comes the subject of maltreatment of women in the ultimate patriarchal culture (HINT: it rhymes with "Islam"), they're not doing (or even saying) a damn thing. Why? Because doing so would violate the feminists' intersectionalist Axis Powers compact with the Muslims,who they need as electoral backup against the Republicans. That one of the key organizers of the "movement" is a woman who went on live TV and said Muslim children were being executed en masse in the U.S. before complaining about 22 states trying to pass anti-Sharia law legislation just makes it all the more cringe-tastic.


But the Patriarchy is totally OK if everybody worships Allah, you guys!

But ultimately, the thing that's going to sink the Women's March hashtag/wannabe political phenomenon is the same fundamental flaw of the Black Lives Matter movement (and how weird is it that we haven't heard shit from them since Trump got elected?) Instead of marching for real empowerment, these skanks and scags and senior citizens are literally broadcasting their self-victimization to the whole world. Instead of positing themselves as principled, determined individuals courageously fighting an uphill battle for what's rightly theirs - i.e., that shit Malcolm X and MLK and Susan B. Anthony did - these womenfolks keep trying to drudge up new ways they're being oppressed and marginalized. Pulling a page out of the LGBT handbook, their strategy is to appear as beat up and de-powered as possible, with the endgame of weaponizing the pitiable charity anybody stupid enough to fall for the ruse showers upon them.

Unfortunately, menstruaters, Americans aren't the kind of peoples who celebrate pity, and we especially don't celebrate people who are clearly the beneficiaries of untold riches and privileges (like, I don't know, not having to go to war and shit) PRETENDING to be persecuted. Take a look at pretty much any gallery of Women's March protesters and you can see for yourself that practically none of them are hurting economically. And if they truly are being tyrannized, it's the first fascistic regime in history where the state sponsored subjugation comes with Starbucks and ample opportunities for selfies.

The alt-left doesn't have the foggiest notion of what Middle Americans stand for - as evident by the fact Democratic Senators are now having to take courses to learn how to have conversations with people who shop at Walmart. One look at the 2016 electoral map lets you know that those who think more like Trump than Clinton are more widely dispersed throughout the country, and if there is ONE thing the outcome of last year's general election demonstrated, it's that Red State America does not appreciate those who make virtue out of their weaknesses. 

And ultimately, what are these Women's March protests but people parading about their self-vaunted vulnerabilities and insecurities in a desperate scramble for sympathy?

That's the problem with your mighty union of hussies, floozies and trollops right there. You can aim for respect or you can aim for pity, but you can never be pitied and respected at the same time.

And trust me, all these demonstrations - the glorified penis envy festivals and traveling showcases of mental illness worship they are ain't doing a damn thing to earn you EITHER the admiration or sorrow of real Americans.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

This Week in Social Justice Warrior-Dom

A fond look back at all the things that had ultra-P.C. jihadists OUTRAGED ... before they forget all about them in just a few days. 



By: Jimbo X
JimboXAmerican@gmail.com
@Jimbo__X
TRUMP WINS.

And for those of you wondering why Hillary lost 
Middle America...
Understandably, a lot of people are all hot and bothered about the outcome of the election, but for just one teensy, tiny second, step outside of the circle and think about just how incredible the election of Donald Trump actually is. For decades, Americans have been clamoring, if not praying, for some third-party messiah to come from the heavens and totally destroy "business as usual" in the two-party political miasma in Washington. Well, the great federal wrecking ball came in the form of the ultimate D.C. outsider, a rich-as-fuck New York real estate kingpin who didn't even need outside funding to butt-fuck an entire 16-person field of elitist, establishment Republican candidates. This, of course, after the media-industrial complex totally laughed off his presidential aspirations and gave him less than a 1 percent chance of winning the G.O.P. nomination. Let me repeat that - the experts said he had LESS THAN A ONE PERCENT CHANCE OF WINNING THE REPUBLICAN TICKET. Yes, Trump may have nominally ran as a Republican, but really, what he did was create his own economic nationalist platform and LITERALLY use the G.O.P. vessel as a launching pad for what was fundamentally a third-party ideology. And of course, instead of viewing Trump's anti-globalist, anti-taxation, pro-military and pro-working class initiatives as a populist plea to the proletariat, the mass media monolith simply kept slamming him with pejoratives like "racist," "sexist" and "xenophobe," all the while completely betraying every cardinal virtue of journalism - to the point of actually COLLUDING WITH THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN TEAM - en route to getting their self-appointed "open-border and open-trade" advocate Hillary Clinton elected. And in that, the pro-Clinton camp made a dire, dire miscalculation. You see, they built an entire campaign around identity politics and virtue signalling, while completely ignoring the universal economic and foreign policy issues that affect all Americans, no matter what color they are or what their genitals look like. While Donald Trump was producing ads highlighting the importance of domestic industrial production and fighting the slow creep of globalization, Hillary ran commercials expressing concern about Trump's comments making teenage girls feel insecure about their weight. Hell, even their respective campaign mottos demonstrated the grave error of Clinton's campaign - while Trump's "Make America Great Again" pitch was anchored around working class populism and a sense of trans-identity nationalism, Hillary's campaign LITERALLY revolved around hardline, feminist, cult-of-personality identitarianism. The Clinton campaign more or less bet the farm on the Lena Dunham demographic, oh-so-naively believing that the self-absorbed, self-victimizing, Tumblrinas of America (in tandem with your usual grab bag of special interests cannon fodder, like the LGBTQI community and the subset of the Muslim-American demographic that doesn't consider women as forms of property) was a strong enough bloc to sweep the general election by at least 300-something points. But in the Clinton campaign's half-hearted pandering to the Black Lives Matter and undocumented immigrant contingent, she totally forgot about the backbone of America: working class and lower middle class FAMILIES. Yes, FAMILIES. You know, the same people who have seen their living wages decrease by nearly 10 percent since NAFTA was enacted while their health care costs increased doubled and even tripled since the Affordable Care Act came online. The same people who wound up getting their hours cut - or even laid off - because of Obama's needless overtime pay regulations that screwed over any salaried worker making less than $50,000 a year. The same people who have seen their manufacturing jobs continue to migrate to Mexico and the same IT workers who had their jobs insourced to H1-B visa workers from India. The same people who live in fear, day in and day out, of losing their jobs due to both the company expense burden of Obama administration diktats and foreign trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership - a plan Hillary gleefully supported (even after "publicly" denouncing it) which if implemented, would have sent not just thousands, but MILLIONS of American jobs to third world sweatboxes in Vietnam and Brunei. And how did the Hillary camp respond? By demanding you consider Trump saying he tried to fuck a woman after taking her furniture shopping ten years ago to be more outrageous than a job-destroying globalist economic framework and a tax-slurping, debt-generating federal behemoth that threatens their very livelihoods as fathers and mothers and ensures their children will live in a far worse country than the one they grew up in. And of course, rather than accept these totally ridiculous concerns as valid, how did the Hillary campaign respond whenever Middle America voiced their worries? What else - they just called them a bunch of racists, xenophobes and misogynists, as if being arbitrarily labeled a bigot by people you've never met was a fate somehow worse than being penniless and unable to financially support your own flesh and blood. The fact of the matter is that all of the divergent subsets Hillary targeted - the aggrieved BLM sorts, the Maoist social justice warrior college thought police, the old ass white liberal ex-hippies, etc. - are the truly privileged in America. Despite their perpetual cries of victimization, they are all attending or have attended college - sometimes at world-class institutes and almost always on the public dime - they grew up in well-to-do families and they've never actually experienced what you would call true manual labor. The incessant, elitist, mindblind, proletariat-shaming disseminated by ultra-privileged tools like Bill Maher and Trevor Noah and literally the entire staff of The Huffington Post is the very reason Hillary, and the Democrats as a whole, lost the election. They were convinced Americans cared more about "grabbed pussies" than a presidential candidate getting away with literally hundreds, if not thousands, of national security violations. They thought yelling and screaming "Nazi" and "Klan member" was an appropriate response to people justifiably scared shitless about losing their careers to government mandates and open border trading. Instead of empathizing with the plight of millions of non-college educated laborers - who, by the way, represent a majority of the nation - Hillary and her aggrieved "fuck the patriarchy" platoons instead mocked and ridiculed their miseries, adding insult to injury by declaring them the beneficiaries of a non-existent "white privilege." So after spending the better part of the year callously belittling and degrading half the country as a bunch of backwards ass white trash too stupid to know what's best for themselves and their families, why is anyone surprised the working and middle class majority told Camp Hillary to go fuck themselves at the polls? 

Welcome to Trump's America, folks. Or as we used to call it before the liberal-produced scourge of cultural Marxism and self-segregating identity politics infected the nation - simply the good old U.S. of A.



The hate that hate of hate produced?

Back in the 1960s, Mike Wallace produced a news program called The Hate That Hate Produced, a pioneering work of leftist-progressivist apologia that deflected the anti-white rancor of the Nation of Islam back on those damn, damn, damn-prejudiced white folks. Well, if such was all fine and well a half a century ago, perhaps it's time for today's media elites to produce a follow-up ... how's about we call it The Hate That Hate of Hate Produced? Yes, it's a bit wordy, but it's nonetheless fitting. The concept? The same way the leftist journalists of the Hippie era found a way to blame whitey for the hardcore honky hatred of militant black nationalists, perhaps the major cable and network news barons can find a way to pin several recent instances of anti-multiculturalist white hatred as the direct consequence of the media's own jihad against anti-globalist white folks? Surely, ya'll heard about the church in Mississippi that got firebombed by obviously aggrieved white supremacists, as evident by the "vote Trump" graffiti spray-painted on the side of the building, right? Indeed, it's a terribly regrettable incident no matter how you shake it, but has it come to anyone's attention that maybe - just maybe - the arson was committed in retaliation for the much, much less-publicized North Carolina G.O.P. building that got fire bombed a few weeks ago by obvious anti-Trumpers? Additionally, none of the stories about the Mississippi church arson dared blamed the incident on the incendiary vitriol of the Clinton campaign - a sharp contrast to coverage of the G.O.P. arson, in which Donald Trump himself was almost always trudged up as a catalyst for the attack (What? Us? Victim-blame? Never!) And surely, the Mississippi arson could never, EVER be a false flag incident perpetrated by an irate black person him or herself. I mean, stuff like that has never happened in American history, especially not last year or anything like that. Along those same lines, maybe we shouldn't look at the curious case of the small Italian hamlet of Albettone, where mayor Joe Formaggio recently declared "Immigrants? If they send them to us, we will protect our houses, we are proud to be racists," as something that happens in a total vacuum. Yes, he indeed stated "here we do not want immigrants, niggers or gypsies, they have a lower I.Q., history proves it," but it's not like the comments were made devoid of some kind of reactionary context. I mean, with the streets of Paris turning into battlegrounds for immigrant turf wars, benefits for unemployed immigrants in Germany skyrocketing and Britons being arrested for "verbal abuse" against Muslims in the U.K., you really can't say the city's brazen intolerance is without some degree of level-headedness. As hateful as Formaggio's comments may be, they clearly have antecedents in the hatred hoisted upon them by anti-Western radicals ... aye, the list there is indeed a lengthy one. Of course, that isn't to say the vitriol and especially the reactionary violence is justifiable (because it isn't), but by that same token, it's also not 100 percent unprovoked, either. Funny how the hate that incites counter-hatred is so routinely disregarded considering who the initial haters are, ain't it?

Halloween is RACIST, declares privileged black man

Imagine, if you will, living in a world in which deep-seated, institutional oppression was so firmly embedded in the society around you that even holidays were secretly a form of persecution for you and your-like skinned in-group. Cue the following tirade from The Root's Michael Harriot, in which the author outlines his reasons for why "Everyday is Halloween for Black People." After arbitrarily designating Labor Day and Fourth of July as specifically black holidays sans any sort of rationale, Harriot then goes on to explain why Halloween is the most "overprivileged," unabashedly white holiday of them all. Per the hyper-paranoid scribe, spooky, moonlit hayrides are no match for the absolute terror black people feel being pulled over by the police at noon on a bright sunny evening, and that the remnants of slavery on display in museums are far more terrifying than anything you'd encounter in a haunted house. Indeed, Harriot contests that even trick-or-treating is somewhat anti-black, seeing as how - folks, I am not making this up - black families tend to borrow ingredients from each other so often that going door-to-door asking for things isn't even remotely atypical. But let's let Harriot put it in his own words why Halloween is so distressingly white:
"Perhaps the biggest reason Halloween is not really a thing in black America is that we wear disguises every day. We have perfected our mask-wearing ever since we were first kidnapped and dragged across the Atlantic. We learned how to muffle moans and stand stone-faced when tied to whipping posts. We were poker-faced when Bull Connor turned on hoses and let German shepherds chew chunks of skin."
Of course, Harriot being a man who received a master's degree from Florida State and covers international economics for a living (not to mention someone who has never actually experienced any of the historical white on black atrocities he constantly laments) I think it's pretty safe to say that - if anything - Harriot is indeed a bit, well, privileged himself. Indeed, considering the guy runs miscellaneous side sites with titles like Very Smart Brothas and Negus Who Read, it seems to me he has quite a bit of a self-superiority complex over his black brethren, positing himself as the African-American community's self-appointed intellectual better. But seeing just how entrenched the anti-Halloween sentiment is in the American black community, methinks Harriot might be onto something - even if that "something" is nothing more than frustration over a lost opportunity to celebrate self-victimization in the public sphere.

African-Canadian who sued police for racism arrested for owning slaves

While the textbook definition of what "racism" entails, precisely, fluctuates wildly, I think it's safe to assume that anyone who dehumanizes a peoples to the point of enslaving them is probably pretty guilty of being at least a teeny-weensy bit prejudiced. And just when you thought a legitimate Black Lives Matter leader getting popped for sex slave trafficking was about as ironic as the intersectionality of neo racial victimization and neo human bondage could possibly get, along comes the story of Jordan Noel, a 28-year-old Canuck who - after successfully suing Ottawa police for racial profiling stemming from a 2011 drug arrest - was recently re-arrested, this time for both beating and forcing his 18-year-old girlfriend to have sex with paying customers. After making bail, Noel as released to his mother, where, among other probation terms, he is forbidden from accessing escort services or visiting strip clubs. Oh, and in case you are wondering how this Noel kid is going to get back on his feet following his latest slavery charges? Well, as it turns out, he's one of the shittiest rappers you've ever heard, assaulting ear drums under the moniker Reggie Slums and dropping such enchanted rhymes as "if you fuck with my money, I'll lay you down," and "when I found some Robert Borden, I made a fortune, I was either selling drugs or doing extortion."

BBC seeks to 'educate' 6-year-olds about the joys of transgender-hood

It's sort of the great paradox of the whole transgender debate: if gender is indeed a socially constructed condition, then doesn't that mean transgenderism itself is also a state of being influenced more culturally than biologically? Of course, to dare aver that "transgenderism" is a learned behavior is not only ridiculous, it is indeed an unmistakable hate crime, with absolutely no scientific backing whatsoever. Which makes all of the hubbub surrounding the new online BBC program Just A Girl all the more befuddling and problematic. I mean, who cares that the head of BBC children's programming herself said the show is an attempt to make the concept of transgenderism more palpable to young audiences too immature to understand multiplication tables or uppercase letters yet? As a matter of fact, not only is it prejudicial for parents to be upset that a program on public-subsidized state television is telling children it's OK to beg your parents to give you hormone therapies and sexual reassignment surgery, porting about such a mentality is itself wholly unnatural. In fact, the parents of children who are so delusional as to believe in the faulty gender binary should lose custody of their offspring and be adopted as property ... I mean, wards, of the state and given all of the necessary medical and surgical "improvements" they desire. And if you're concerned about the safety of giving children procedures that appear to correlate with a lifetime suicide attempt rate of damn near 50 percent ... well, you just keep your hateful opinions to yourself, you horrible, horrible homophobe.

LGBT task force demands Canadian teachers drop gendered pronouns and just call their students 'comrades' instead

For years and years, a lot of critical folks on the right (including a few homosexuals themselves) have criticized the gay political identity movement for incorporating, well, some fairly commie-esque tactics. Indeed, the bible of the contemporary gay rights movement, After the Ball, is little more than a slight finessing and readjustment of Red China's social engineering Mao Tao, right down to the whole "struggle session" tomfoolery. That in mind, perhaps you can see why quite a few parents are might miffed about the Alberta Teachers' Association issuing educators a 150-page "manual" on suggestions (read: non-negotiable demands) for teaching school children about LGBTQI issues. The "Prism Toolkit for Safety and Caring Discussions" throws out all sorts of fabulous ideas for teachers, but believe it or not, its suggestion to invite drag performers to class isn't the most eyebrow raising. And no, neither is its suggestion to replace the terms "mom" and "dad" with the much more authoritative sounding "caregiver" and "guardian." Rather, it's the manual's suggestion that to skirt around the skein of "gender pronouns" kids are so keen on nowadays, educators ought to do away with terms like "he" or "she" and simply refer to everyone in class as comrade. And in case you were wondering - it only took $191,000 in public funding to produce the training materials, which, according to Alberta's Education Ministry Chief of Staff, is but just one of many School Act-branded propaganda tools educators across the province are free to use to extol the virtues of confusing the ever-loving shit out of middle schoolers

Citing declining sales, Bud Light yanks Amy Schumer and Seth Rogen ads from airwaves

The same way the aggressively politicized NFL has experienced a sharp decline in viewership this season, Budweiser (yes, the same folks that literally rechristened their socially-corrosive, family-destroying product as "America" over the summer), noted that sales of its Bud Light brand have been on a steep downward trajectory all year long. With just about every metric accounted for, the only major explanation the company has been able to posit about their declining sales has been an ill-received, super-expensive marketing campaign starring hyper-liberal, smug-as-shit, overrated Hollywood "comedians" Amy "Yes, I am related to Chuck" Schumer and Seth "LOL I'm fat but in all my movies I'm boinking super hot actresses" Rogen. The nine month campaign - which has sought to sell beer while not-so-furtively touting pro-progressivist messages about gay marriage, gender identity and equal pay - came to an abrupt end after the brand's third quarter sales proved to be the worst of the year from "a volume and share perspective," per a Bud Light spokesperson. Still, despite the financial failure of the "Bud Light Party" campaign, the company remains optimistic that similarly-political-in-nature advertising will carry well with millennial drinkers. Indeed, as soon as she's done tweeting cartoons about how much better the world will be without white men in it, I'm sure serial child molester Lena Dunham would make a most excellent brand ambassador.

Social media hordes want YouTuber banned from Internet for being too thin

Seeing as how we're a culture so hell-bent on defending minorities of seemingly all varieties from the *totally-not-at-all-exaggerated* tyranny of the masses, I find it oh-so-curious that at least one sizeable (cue rimshot) majority  in the U.S. constantly posits themselves as the victims of a deeply prejudiced "anti-fat" mentality ... you know, the same country where seven out of 10 people are considered medically overweight, with a bona fide medically obese rate quickly closing in on two-fifths of the total national populace. In that, people who are actually at a quasi-normal body weight constitute a considerable minority in the country, but what do you know, the not-so-pleasantly-plump plurality now maintains that the major public health menace today isn't the skyrocketing rate of lumbering lard-asses coast-to-coast, but people being too fucking skinny for their own good. Enter one Eugenia Cooney, a downright skeletal YouTube fashion-vlogger (oh, how it burns to type that) who recently became the subject of a Change.Org petition that sought to bar her from the Intrawebs because her "unobtainable" and "unhealthy" body type may convince young girls to barf and starve themselves skinny. More than 18,000 electronic signatures were collected before the original petitioner pulled the virtual plug on the project, which - surprise, surprise - wasn't effective in either convincing YouTube to shit can her because of the heavy set's heavy pressure OR convincing the gaunt emo girl to eat herself into a 200-pound-plus blob of redundant adipose tissue. Naturally, this raises the most obvious question in the history of things being obvious: if it's OK to shame a thin person for health reasons, then why is it considered a crime against humanity to shame an overweight person for similar health reasons? Looks to me like we're dealing with a classic example of wide privilege here, aren't we?

Lil' Wayne gives the GREATEST interview of all-time

Contrary to what you may have heard, we here at The Internet Is In America are great admirers of what is commonly referred to as "black popular culture." Indeed, some of our all-time favorite movies and television series can best be described as "Afro-centric," including such immortal offerings as Diff'rent Strokes, What's Happening?, Shaft, Dolemite, Cooley High, the motherfuckin' Brotherhood of Death  and really, everything Rudy Ray Moore has ever done in his life. Alas, while we are quite keen on old school rap (our mutual love of the Geto Boys discography is well publicized), we really don't listen to much contemporary hip-hop, primarily on the account it all sounds like a bunch of pussified, auto-tuned, self-victimizing, identity politics pandering bullshit. That said, considering the incredible spate of media comments from Nawlins rapper Lil' Wayne recently, perhaps we ought to give this guy's music a thorough listening. On a recent episode of Nightline, the New Orleans rhyme-slanger (who was criticized a few weeks ago for stating he's never actually experienced anyone being openly racist to him), was asked for his thoughts on the Black Lives Matter. His responses are worth quoting in full, and perhaps putting on American currency someday:
"I am a young, black rich motherfucker. If that don't let you know America understand black mother fuckers matter these days, I don't know what it is. That man white, he filming me. I'm a nigger. I don't know what you mean, man. Don't come at me with that dumb shit, ma'am. My life matter, especially to my bitches."
"I don't feel connected to a damn thing that ain't got nothing to do with me. If you do, you're crazy as shit. You. Not the camera, you. Feeling connected to something that ain't got nothing to do with you? If it ain't got nothing to do with me, I ain't connected to it." 
And in a post-election world sure to be driven to the brink of total societal madness by untempered identity politicking, we should all take heed of Lil' Wayne's incredibly astute declaration about the pros of individualism and the many, many cons of self-segregating, weaponized collectivism. Hell, he's got my vote for 2020 already.

...and a few headlines that speak for themselves...

Senior citizen in New York punched to death in city streets

13-year-olds in Utah overdose on "pink"


San Diego church declares voting Democrat a "mortal sin"

Washington state teacher shitcanned for wearing Michael Jordan mask at Halloween party

Nearly half a million Swedish women sexually assaulted in 2015; report suspiciously devoid of details about attackers

Atlanta area cop charged with sodomizing 13-year-old he met on Grindr

Baylor "blackout" game criticized as rape culture apologia

Pittsburgh man said he raped woman simply because she was white

CNN gets photographer to pose as anti-Trump protester

Woman  who lied to media about going hiking with Hillary Clinton after election loss was actually one of her campaign workers

Elementary schooler beaten to the point he needed crutches for voting for Trump in a mock election

High school sophomore viciously attacked by fellow student for saying she hoped Trump won on Instagram

Senior citizen mercilessly attacked, robbed and carjacked by teens who thought he looked like somebody who voted for Trump

African-American chased off city streets following Trump's election ... by other African-Americans

Latina protestor literally tells CNN "people have to die" in wake of Trump's election

Conan O'Brien does "comedy" bit about gassing Trump supporters

Police conclude Muslim student lied about being attacked by Trump supporters

Orange is the New Black actress expresses desire to "pick up a baseball bat and take out every f*cking republican and independent I see"

Mexico's richest man loses $5 billion as soon as Trump declared president-elect

Mom finds out young child voted for Trump in mock election, proceeds to record his abuse on Facebook

Democrats deathly afraid of Trump's alleged racism and misogyny find scapegoat for Hillary's loss - a black woman